-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Are you keeping your Prime subscription?
gregmcc
Honorary Master
3 incorrect statements there already.
Kinda curious why a media company with so much in-house talent uses web sourced images for their website?
http://www.hdwallpapers.in/unknown_destiny-wallpapers.html
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://image.flaticon.com/sprites/new_packs/275278-space.png&imgrefurl=http://www.flaticon.com/packs/design-set&h=564&w=600&tbnid=aXfpn2nW_eMV3M&tbnh=218&tbnw=232&usg=__gdfEdl4tODoZFof6Zl-b7ApPeqI=&hl=en&docid=GVIV8hewuOSi9M
Or is this just a mock-up?
http://www.hdwallpapers.in/unknown_destiny-wallpapers.html
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://image.flaticon.com/sprites/new_packs/275278-space.png&imgrefurl=http://www.flaticon.com/packs/design-set&h=564&w=600&tbnid=aXfpn2nW_eMV3M&tbnh=218&tbnw=232&usg=__gdfEdl4tODoZFof6Zl-b7ApPeqI=&hl=en&docid=GVIV8hewuOSi9M
Or is this just a mock-up?
Last edited:
http://arstechnica.com/features/2014/07/dark-matter-makes-up-80-of-the-universe-but-where-is-it-all/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
2 links saying two different things. 27% does seem more realistic though tbh.
gregmcc
Honorary Master
27% is more accurate.
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
It can also be detected:
https://home.cern/about/physics/dark-matter
https://science.nasa.gov/astrophysics/focus-areas/what-is-dark-energy
It can also be detected:
https://home.cern/about/physics/dark-matter
Wikipedia link says:
Dark matter is transparent to electromagnetic radiation and/or is so dense and small that it fails to absorb or emit enough radiation to be detectable with current imaging technology
ye just testing color schemes and theme at the mo and what people think