NEWSFLASH, this is what's happening already. You are paying for state healthcare as well as your private one.
And the government side of the equation has failed. So why must more of my income go to it?
And there I was valuing my property worth insuring for fire. Well done me. Only my neighbour didn't. No fire brigade to call when his property began buring so it raged on until it became uncontrollable...that's when my building caught fire....oops too late... the fire was uncontrollable.
Congrats for the strawman. You didn't address my argument. If everyone can afford to have private insurance, would you advocate universal healthcare? If so, why?
The only myth is that an efficent state service provides dedicated resouces for 100% of the population, and that the remainder is wasted. What an infantile notion.
You were the one who said 100% in your incomprehensible ramblings. See below.
The state insures the health of 100 people. (100% of population)
"Needs and desires" is a value judgement, typically people who perceive they are of higher risk buy private health insurance.
Want to see another value judgement....
Private healthcare has 20% paying for 25% (5% profit) with an overall higher risk & cost per person is high PLUS you have associate productivity and socio-economic problems for the uninsured.
How is saying that the uninsured will have increased productivity and less socio-economic problems, not a value judgement. Are you not judging the benefits of NHI to be greater than the perceived costs?
If you are not making any such judgement, then why implement it. If the benefits don't > costs, why do it?
You assume that the uninsured don't work hard, and then lead to the assumption that them being healthy won't positively effect their productivity.
No, but I know some will, some won't. Some people will have increased productivity, some will have decreased productivity. YOU are the one making the value judgements as you are the one saying we must do this and justifying it by saying we would have an increase in productivity.
How do you measure this? Please show me the evidence, which will show both the affects of the NHI on increasing and decreasing productivity and how there is an overall increase.
The services provides service to those who need it and like private institutions provision accordingly. Universal access <> universal service.
The service creates market distortions, removes choice and individual freedom, reduces overall quality of healthcare for the people who can afford health insurance now, increases the costs of those who have private healthcare now and wish to remain on private healthcare.
All so a bunch of liberals can pat themselves on the back, and the ANC can get votes.