South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
R9999 with the IS STM 18-55 kit lens...
R5k of which I paid with ebucks...
R9999 with the IS STM 18-55 kit lens...
R5k of which I paid with ebucks...
General note - I'm quite shocked at the price of lenses now. I've had a quick look at pricing for some new glass and nearly swallowed my tongue.
My future wife brought me a 17-85 IS USM Canon lens that I still have, even though I don't have a Canon DSLR anymore lol. Very versatileThat tacky 18-55 lens promptly came off and never ever went back on again.
The new version of the 18-55 will kick your 17-85's butt, the 18-55 STM lens probably only loses out from 55-85 but betters your lens in every other respect.
Even the 18-55 mark ii IS is optically superior...
Canon - at the time it was cheaper and, more importantly, it fit my hand better. THB it's all pretty much muchness - they're both very capable brands in the right hands. Nikon's got Nikon D-Lighting, Canon ALO... Nikon has some nice JPG presets but it's simple to create your own preset on the PC and then import it onto the camera...
*facepalm* Oh man, you're not a nice person are you? Hur hur hur, I'm not gonna come on here and contribute anything of value, I'm rather gonna come on here to mock a lens that has some sentimental value to you. Stick that.
Just pointing out the "tacky 18-55" is anything but tacky these days. Your comment might be taken as being relevant to the current (and previous) version by someone looking to buy the lens.
I'm still going to mug you for your glass one day.
He did say the old one that came with old low end kits...
That tacky 18-55 lens promptly came off and never ever went back on again.
Just pointing out the "tacky 18-55" is anything but tacky these days. Your comment might be taken as being relevant to the current (and previous) version by someone looking to buy the lens.
Generally I've found the 18-55mm lenses are more capable than most of the people using them.
He didn't actually, he just referenced the "tacky 18-55" without specifying which one he had.
Yeah, the mid-level Canons do feel good, with soft squidgy buttons and rubber grips, but the entry-level Canons are a different story altogether: sharp-edged plastic buttons that don't have much feel, and hard plastic body panels. In the entry-level, I find that Nikons feel like better quality (especially on the lenses ... that 18-55mm non-IS lens on the older Canon entry-level kits is a crime against photography).
Follow the conversation, dave...
Now sybawoods, maybe you'd like to kindly stop hijacking this thread and go create your own to discuss 'Mirrorless vs DSLR', which is quite a different topic to what I had here.
Pretty much the same experience I had. Canon's button configuration also just seems much better.Canon - at the time it was cheaper and, more importantly, it fit my hand better. THB it's all pretty much muchness - they're both very capable brands in the right hands. Nikon's got Nikon D-Lighting, Canon ALO... Nikon has some nice JPG presets but it's simple to create your own preset on the PC and then import it onto the camera...