Noseweek: The Full iBurst vs Craigavon Article

Gary, this article has not previously been posted in full AFAIK. If so, please forward the link.
The story quoted all of the parties involved. I hope you're not saying they didn't have a chance to make their views know, because that's evidently untrue.
The article tries to get to the heart of a matter that is important in a community's life. Refusing to discuss the matter or trying to get people banned doesn't help your own cause. In fact it weakens the counter-argument.
We need robust debate here, not sweeping of carpets.

It was not posted before in its entirety because the article is copyright. And you could have just left it at that. The article can stand for itself, it does not need you contacting people by private message to further your own agenda. We are not refusing to discuss the matter, it has been discussed already on this board at length and then died out on it's own. It is interesting though that you see the need to start scratching here. What is your interest in the matter? As I told you, I really have no interest in the matter, but I do reserve the right to comment on the quality of the articles that people choose to post here on MyBB. You posted it in public so it is now fair game for us to comment on it. That does not amount to censorship. But stirring k@k on the board here will most likely get you banned. At least that's what I would have done. Maybe rpm has more tolerance than me. I dunno. :D
 
I'll post this here since I don't know if banned people can read their pms. Banning probably happened because of posted copyrighted article.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X