Nov1 uncapped accounts.Will there be any ???

Hi Scoobydoo check my signature, i think its the cheapest available uncapped solution.

512K for R1250
 
Last edited:
LOL!! What happened to this world we live in....
 
rburley said:
**** sakes from R199 to R2700, tsk tsk tsk
Click to expand...

If I recall correctly, the R199 for 30GIG doesnt mean uncapped ;-)

Uncapped on R199 for 30GIG would have worked out 5x30GIG ie R1000 for 150GIG traffic on 512k, which is possible a month. Uncapped on 1mbit would have cost thus R2000 during the 30GIG time.
 
uunet uncapped is really best effort atm, been using it self for a long time and gaming only possible after business hours.. mostly 60ms when the network isnt congested.

Downloading internationally is up and down, if u want an uncapped solution and not worry about getting capped, its fine.

But I wouldnt recommend it if you were aiming at gaming local/internationally only.. International traffic is shaped really badly, 800-1000ms with 30-50% packetloss.

googleplex should really update the FAQ, uunet uncapped hasnt been unshaped for MONTHS.

To give you the international latency idea, here is examples taken few minutes ago. This isnt a once off problem, this is the way the network is configured for months now, and its not a problem.

HTTP Access via uunet is as fast, if not faster than normal saix accounts, most of the time.


PING google.com (216.239.57.99): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=235 time=1211.424 ms
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=235 time=999.215 ms
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=235 time=1164.712 ms
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=235 time=918.739 ms
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=235 time=827.485 ms
64 bytes from 216.239.57.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=235 time=970.303 ms
^C
--- google.com ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 6 packets received, 33% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 827.485/1015.313/1211.424/133.959 ms


PING cs.jolt.co.uk (195.149.21.9): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=0 ttl=45 time=936.102 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=1 ttl=45 time=828.444 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=3 ttl=45 time=1186.696 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=4 ttl=45 time=1136.159 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=5 ttl=45 time=1184.478 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=6 ttl=45 time=1016.938 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=8 ttl=45 time=1183.091 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=10 ttl=45 time=896.860 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=11 ttl=45 time=1111.096 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=13 ttl=45 time=918.509 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=14 ttl=45 time=892.650 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=15 ttl=45 time=1054.789 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=18 ttl=45 time=1116.846 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=19 ttl=45 time=1161.370 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=22 ttl=45 time=959.083 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=23 ttl=45 time=956.024 ms
64 bytes from 195.149.21.9: icmp_seq=25 ttl=45 time=754.531 ms
^C
--- cs.jolt.co.uk ping statistics ---
27 packets transmitted, 17 packets received, 37% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 754.531/1017.274/1186.696/132.261 ms
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X