Referencing Userbenchmark as a source again,
@Jan ?
Here is the unabridged UB "review" of the RX 6600, just so you can see what caliber of writers you have running that site.
Whilst the drought in the GPU market continues, street prices for AMD cards are around 50% lower than comparable (based on headline average fps figures) Nvidia cards. Many experienced users simply have no interest in buying AMD cards, regardless of price. The combined market share for all of AMD’s RX 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers (Steam stats) is just 2.12% whilst Nvidia’s RTX 2060 alone accounts for 5.03%. AMD’s Neanderthal marketing tactics seem to have come back to haunt them. Their brazen domination of social media platforms including youtube and reddit resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products. Experienced gamers know all too well that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set.
Yeah. That's the kind of unbiased quality tech journalism I'm looking for when making a purchasing decision.
As for the average 6% you quoted from the UB "comparison", here is the actual figure from a reputable tech site:
If you don't feel like watching the whole thing, the short version is that the RX6600 is
29% faster then the RTX3050 at 1080p and
23% faster at 1440p, while costing less. Bit of a far cry from 6%, wouldn't you agree?
If this comes across as a rant... It absolutely is. Userbenchmark is a garbage site providing garbage results that should not be used for any meaningful comparison, by anyone, ever.
Sign up with Google
