PostmanPot
Honorary Master
Yes ,but i Will rather recommend a smaller size 4k tv . Tv series are now coming out in 4k. Movies will soon be out in 4k.
Couches aren't moving closer to TVs, so no.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yes ,but i Will rather recommend a smaller size 4k tv . Tv series are now coming out in 4k. Movies will soon be out in 4k.
BwahahaCouches aren't moving closer to TVs, so no.
Bwahaha
OT/ jou kop clutch nie...
OT/ jou kop clutch nie...
What does this mean?
I'm going to guess and say "you're out of your mind".
![]()
In order to benefit from higher resolutions, we need to move closer. Anyone who believes otherwise is out of their mind.
I've been watching my 46" FHD from 1 meter for around five years already.
I'd have to wear glasses if I sat further away.![]()
An abnormal viewing distance for that very reason.
Huh?
It's perfect.
CMR of 60hz :erm:
Huh?
It's perfect.
Much too close. Optimal would be about 2m.
Now you need glasses sooner.
The point is that like 1% of people sit that close to their TVs. Therefore higher resolutions are useless to like 99% of them.
Much too close. Optimal would be about 2m.
Now you need glasses sooner.
The point is that like 1% of people sit that close to their TVs. Therefore higher resolutions are useless to like 99% of them.
Actually, it's 1.5 times the diagonal size of your screen, iirc. So in your case 46" x 1.5, converted to metres, would be perfect. (You work it out)
Man, you keep banging on about this optimal viewing distance business. I can tell the difference between HD, FHD and UHD from almost any distance when comparing TVs in a shop. It's not that difficult to do. It might be that the extra resolution loses fidelity from further away, but the impression is still of a smoother sharper image.
The point I was referring to was one about eyesight degradation from sitting far too close.
"Almost any distance" - I don't believe you. I will also place a bet that you were looking at large +-50" TVs and up.
Well, it could be that the TVs I was looking at were 50 and up, yeah. I wouldn't argue with that. But who tries to view a 40" tv from more than 2 metres away anyhow? If your viewing distance is going to be so far then you need a minimum of 50".
The point I was referring to was one about eyesight degradation from sitting far too close.
snip...