Offer to purchase question

I am looking at a house that was built out of what looks like to be plaster bricks, but they never plastered it, basically treated it as facebrick. Either that or it is just one ugly and rough brick. I can imagine this would have attracted a lot of moisture. Is it still possible to seal it and plaster it or better to avoid?
View attachment 1511933
I would buy that, leave the bricks as is.
Rip out those windows and frames. Replace it with aluminium frames and double glaze glass. I would put a nice plaster band around all the windows and garage openings.

I Will also rip out all the doors, gutters and replace it with aluminium doors.

If thats the outside then the inside must look hideous
 
I would buy that, leave the bricks as is.
Rip out those windows and frames. Replace it with aluminium frames and double glaze glass. I would put a nice plaster band around all the windows and garage openings.

I Will also rip out all the doors, gutters and replace it with aluminium doors.

If thats the outside then the inside must look hideous
I don't think I have seen a single house in my price range that is not hideous, lol.
 
I don't think I have seen a single house in my price range that is not hideous, lol.
I've changed my mind.

Plaster the whole house and paint it arniston white. Paint the roof charcoal black. White aluminium doors and window frames. Charcoal grey cobble pavers for the walk ways and driveway.
White aluminium gutters hooked up to a desert color jojo tank.
 
This thread was like gold for a first-time buyer such as myself.

I was able to submit an OTP on a house. During the viewing we picked up a couple of issues that need to be fixed, but nothing major. We submitted an offer of R250K below the asking price which the sellers accepted.

After the home inspection was done, it was noted that the roof and the structure needs maintenance. There is also an ant infestation on the property that needs to be dealt with. The inspector mentioned that the roof is top priority with winter approaching. Is it unreasonable for me to expect the seller to fix these issues?
 
This thread was like gold for a first-time buyer such as myself.

I was able to submit an OTP on a house. During the viewing we picked up a couple of issues that need to be fixed, but nothing major. We submitted an offer of R250K below the asking price which the sellers accepted.

After the home inspection was done, it was noted that the roof and the structure needs maintenance. There is also an ant infestation on the property that needs to be dealt with. The inspector mentioned that the roof is top priority with winter approaching. Is it unreasonable for me to expect the seller to fix these issues?

If its stated in the OTP (and the both agreed, then its on the seller), if not .... I doubt it
 
If you asked him/them whether there were any problems with the roof and said "no" and you can show that they should have known about the problem. Then you may have a case. But I'm no expert here.
 
If you asked him/them whether there were any problems with the roof and said "no" and you can show that they should have known about the problem. Then you may have a case. But I'm no expert here.

The law is now “its voetsoots”. Even with issues. If the drama gets out if hand, walk away
 
If you asked him/them whether there were any problems with the roof and said "no" and you can show that they should have known about the problem. Then you may have a case. But I'm no expert here.
Maintenance vs defect repairs?
 
This thread was like gold for a first-time buyer such as myself.

I was able to submit an OTP on a house. During the viewing we picked up a couple of issues that need to be fixed, but nothing major. We submitted an offer of R250K below the asking price which the sellers accepted.

After the home inspection was done, it was noted that the roof and the structure needs maintenance. There is also an ant infestation on the property that needs to be dealt with. The inspector mentioned that the roof is top priority with winter approaching. Is it unreasonable for me to expect the seller to fix these issues?

If you bought through an agent the onus is on her/him to list defects.
 
It has been mentioned before, but far too important not to repeat: In a sectional title scheme, always get hold of, and study, the title deed and BC documents:


“You can use any of these parkings, they are always available.”
Do not allow yourself to be comfortable with a statement like this one. Parking is by far one of the most contentious issues in community schemes. The fact that certain behavior has been accepted or tolerated for years (or even decades) does not mean it is legal. You do not want to put yourself in a position where you thought you had a right to do or use something only to find out later that no such right existed.

What can you do?

Ask the estate agent and/or owner for copies of the following documentation:
  1. The scheme’s Conduct and Management Rules, as filed and accepted by CSOS;
  2. The scheme’s sectional plan, as registered in the local Deeds Registry; and
  3. The current owner’s title deed, as furnished by said Deeds Registry.

If the right to use the particular bay is not expressly conveyed on one of these documents you cannot accept that you would have a right to park there once you purchase the property.

“The scheme’s finances are in order, we just cannot give you proof because the POPI Act prohibits us from doing so.”

While the legislature may have had only good intentions when creating the Protection of Personal Information Act, in practice I have often found it being used as an excuse to hide or otherwise withhold information from those legally entitled to it. As the body corporate’s debts will become the unit owner’s debt as well, you cannot do a proper due diligence and make an informed decision about buying the property without carefully reviewing the scheme’s financial records.

What can you do?

Your first step is to get the seller (the current registered owner of the unit) to sign a written authorisation granting you authority to request copies of the body corporate’s records and documents. You can then send this letter of authority to the body corporate, together with a written request for copies of:

  1. The current and previous years’ approved budgets (I recommend requesting at least the last three);
  2. The most recent and previous financial years’ financial statements (again, request at least three);
  3. All orders made by CSOS adjudicators, arbitrators, magistrates and/or judges in matters to which the body corporate was a party (these can reveal very important financial information);
  4. The minutes of previous general and trustee meetings held (I suggest asking for at least three years’ minutes to evaluate important things like the implementation of the scheme’s maintenance, repair and replacement plan over time).

The body corporate is legally obliged to make this documentation available to you within 10 days of receiving your authorised written request and any claim that the POPI Act prevents them from doing so is without basis in law. Once you receive the requested documentation you can critically evaluate the scheme’s financial position and make an informed decision regarding whether or not you should purchase property in that scheme.

 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X