APoc184
Honorary Master
Another thing that rarely gets penalised is the kick chaser falling on the retreating player when he slides to collect the ball.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Definitely, agreed on both accounts.
It's also illegal (from this year) to put your hands on the ground over a ruck and then 'sweep' them back to gather the ball. Have only seen 1 penalty awarded for this so far this year.
Definitely, agreed on both accounts.
It's also illegal (from this year) to put your hands on the ground over a ruck and then 'sweep' them back to gather the ball. Have only seen 1 penalty awarded for this so far this year.
It is? That sounds quite ridiculous to be honest. What could possible be illegal about that? If you've shown daylight, remain on your feet, and then get your hands on the ball, it shouldn't matter how you secure the ball at that point. I cannot see the benefit in this ruling, nor what it is they're trying to address...![]()
This I agree with. The 'reason' is that it's easy to throw your arms over the tackled player and when the cleaners come and shove you off, your hands are then pushed back over the ball... IE you are not attempting to play the ball directly, more to try and win a penalty.
But it largely does not make any difference. If I can get to the ball before your cleaners arrive, then surely I am entitled to win the turnover?
Yeah it kind of eliminates the need for cleaners at the ruck, this new rule. Too much nannying going on here. If a player can go through all of the new rigmarole required for a legal attempt at the ball, and does so before the cleaners arrive, there's no reason to penalise him because of the position of his body over the ball ffs. That's just ridiculous...
It is? That sounds quite ridiculous to be honest. What could possible be illegal about that? If you've shown daylight, remain on your feet, and then get your hands on the ball, it shouldn't matter how you secure the ball at that point. I cannot see the benefit in this ruling, nor what it is they're trying to address...![]()
I honestly feel like reffing (or lack thereof) has seen more of the spotlight this season.
I understand that more 'pressure' has been placed on the refs, but they have the technology to go along with it.... and 'clearly' bad calls are STILL made. Add that to what's mentioned above and we have games that could have had different results, based on the ref.
I want more TMO involvement, tbh. When they see a decision that is patently erroneous from an on-field ref they should be able to patch through to him and advise him.
Unfortunately we've had some shocker TMO decisions over the last couple of months, too.![]()
In this case though, the power is in the wrong man's hands. There was that game in NZ I think (forget who was playing) where the TMO advised the ref that a try should not be awarded (which it should not have been) only to have the ref overrule the TMO and award it anyways.
In general, if a ref is having a bad game, but is calling both sides equally, at least there is consistency. I just don't like the fact that they can really take the game away from a team due to rather poor decisions.
Another thing that rarely gets penalised is the kick chaser falling on the retreating player when he slides to collect the ball.
This weekend will have some more 50/50 calls..... Why can't teams be consistent?
BULLS - I'd rather breed with an Ozzie before I pick a team against them
I think this is how the Bulls fans were born![]()
![]()
Boer Soek n Vrou tv show has moved filming to Perth.
Expect more Bulls fans in about a year from now...