Official Super14 2010 Thread

Which South African Super 14 team do you support?

  • Bulls

    Votes: 46 31.1%
  • Sharks

    Votes: 33 22.3%
  • Lions

    Votes: 9 6.1%
  • Stormers

    Votes: 54 36.5%
  • Cheetahs

    Votes: 6 4.1%

  • Total voters
    148
wow lance, the bulls lost 1 game, sjoe, maybe we must re-structure our whole union, surely things can only get worse from here on....

Yes, you guys are extremely clever in hindsight, however, my comments were made prior to the close call and the loss.
 
Yeah he is in exceptional form in the last few matches :

Steyn came into the match with an 82 percent kicking success rate but landed only [/B]five goals from nine attempts.


so, he had 82% success, right? would that be "good" in your books?

5/9 = 55.56% success, so that would be bad right????

Wow, I don't know about you, but if my kicker is the leading points scorer in the last 2 super 14 seasons, has a success rate of 82% in the first 6 games, and 56% in 2 games [thus his avg (for the first six) is 82%, and on his "worst" is 56%] I'm sure we will be ok as a team.....
 
Last edited:
Seems I was right about the 2cents worth - over-valued. I think I may sit this one out. Last week was too exhausting for me, physically and emotionally. Like Wayne's World: I laughed, I cried, I hurled.
 
:wtf: Have the Bulls as yet had a non SA ref .... I see even when they play on tour they have SA refs.

Didn't anyone tell you sharks? You can request the ref to train with you and then with mind control techn. you can make him hand you the game... or 7 out of the 8 at least....

Let us apply some Lance logic (tm)

The bulls winning margin decreased every week till this weekend. Thus we have gone through the bad patch and since or PD in this weekends victory was 13 I take it we are now on the positive slope of the "Form" graph.

The sharks however:

18-19 (-1 PD)
25-20 (-5 PD)
35-06 (-29 PD)
25-21 (-4 PD)
24-22 (-2 PD)
16-30 (+14 PD)
26-29 (+3 PD)

Thus the sharks hit peak form last week according to Lance logic and will now continue to "lose" form.

Here you go lance I understood what you were trying to say, it does not change the fact that it makes you seem stupid.

Now please answer the question :)

Ps if you can not read the basic trend in those stats aka the slope then you are even less intelligent than I thought :o

O if you can not visualize the graphs please draw one for the sharks and one for the Bulls in Excel.
 
Last edited:
Oh dear, the famously held stereotype of a Bulls supporter seems to be getting enhanced in this thread.....




Anyone spot the comments in the news reports about the number of AWB members crammed into the Wimpy to catch the rugby before the funeral?
 
ok, lancelogic (TM) time on the sharks:

Sharks vs Highlanders: 14 point margin - good victory
Sharks vs Hurricanes: 3 point margin - o no,
Sharks vs Reds: 2 point margin - still going down ....

so lance, the margin went from 14 - 3 - 2 ... whats next for the Sharks????? alarm bells going off yet??? is all hope lost????
 
ok, lancelogic (TM) time on the sharks:

Sharks vs Highlanders: 14 point margin - good victory
Sharks vs Hurricanes: 3 point margin - o no,
Sharks vs Reds: 2 point margin - still going down ....

so lance, the margin went from 14 - 3 - 2 ... whats next for the Sharks????? alarm bells going off yet??? is all hope lost????

My prediction is that the Sharks will neither win nor lose this weekend, hence resulting in a "0 point margin", hence maintaining that trend and proving your valued Lancelogic. So I'm proven correct again! Thanks
 
Oh dear, the famously held stereotype of a Bulls supporter seems to be getting enhanced in this thread.....

Anyone spot the comments in the news reports about the number of AWB members crammed into the Wimpy to catch the rugby before the funeral?

so now all bulls supporters are AWB supporters ????

by your sig, if racist make you sick, then stereotyping would go hand in hand with that, no?
 
My prediction is that the Sharks will neither win nor lose this weekend, hence resulting in a "0 point margin", hence maintaining that trend and proving your valued Lancelogic. So I'm proven correct again! Thanks

Seems like a weak attempt at sarcasm [not quite sure]

either sarcasm, or you have nothing of value to add, i'm sure everyone here knows the sharks are not playing this weekend, hence 0 margin.... wrong actually, if you don't play, there is no margin lance....

or, [but this will be very weak] this was an attempt to divert away from the question that was posed...

make your pick....
 
so now all bulls supporters are AWB supporters ????

by your sig, if racist make you sick, then stereotyping would go hand in hand with that, no?

Ha ha ha did you see what you just did? I merely pointed out a news report that said a number of AWB supporters were watching the rugby game before the funeral. I made no mention of who they were supporting! You then drew the conclusion that this must mean all Bulls supporters are ANC supporters!! ha ha ha is their something you know that the rest of us don't?
 
Ha ha ha did you see what you just did? I merely pointed out a news report that said a number of AWB supporters were watching the Bulls game before the funeral. You then drew the conclusion that this must mean all Bulls supporters are ANC supporters!! ha ha ha is their something you know that the rest of us don't?

At least he can draw conclusions... you on the other hand is close to Juliass in the part where you just shout a bit louder....
 
Ha ha ha did you see what you just did? I merely pointed out a news report that said a number of AWB supporters were watching the rugby game before the funeral. I made no mention of who they were supporting! You then drew the conclusion that this must mean all Bulls supporters are ANC supporters!! ha ha ha is their something you know that the rest of us don't?

:wtf:

Well Lance, were you implying it or not [either way, don't care, YOU know what you were implying, and I know you were implying it]. Applying logic to your statement would show that you were subtly implying that, yes....

but why bring that up in any way? we were discussing lancelogic(TM) and bulls/sharks, and you decided to go the AWB/watching bulls rugby route... ran out of something to argue, so lets try and a new tactic..... i thought you didn't like it when people go off-topic?
 
:wtf:

Well Lance, were you implying it or not [either way, don't care, YOU know what you were implying, and I know you were implying it]. Applying logic to your statement would show that you were subtly implying that, yes....

but why bring that up in any way? we were discussing lancelogic(TM) and bulls/sharks, and you decided to go the AWB/watching bulls rugby route... ran out of something to argue, so lets try and a new tactic..... i thought you didn't like it when people go off-topic?

As he showed with his logic, his team does not have to adhere to the rules.... so I am guessing Lance is the exception on his own pet peeves....

That almost makes as much sense as his lancelogic(tm)
 
:wtf:

Well Lance, were you implying it or not [either way, don't care, YOU know what you were implying, and I know you were implying it]. Applying logic to your statement would show that you were subtly implying that, yes....

Damn, did someone just teach you the word logic? You sure are using it a lot recently.

but why bring that up in any way? we were discussing lancelogic(TM) and bulls/sharks, and you decided to go the AWB/watching bulls rugby route... ran out of something to argue, so lets try and a new tactic..... i thought you didn't like it when people go off-topic?

Sorry I mistakenly thought this was a Super 14 thread. I had no idea it was a "Lancelot rocks" thread. Sorry. Because I mistakenly thought it was a Super 14 thread I thought it would be on topic to mention that even in news reports on the Terreblanche funeral the Super 14 rugby was raised. Could people please give their threads more accurate titles in future so I don't make this mistake again? Thanks.
 
Damn, did someone just teach you the word logic? You sure are using it a lot recently.

Sorry I mistakenly thought this was a Super 14 thread. I had no idea it was a "Lancelot rocks" thread. Sorry. Because I mistakenly thought it was a Super 14 thread I thought it would be on topic to mention that even in news reports on the Terreblanche funeral the Super 14 rugby was raised. Could people please give their threads more accurate titles in future so I don't make this mistake again? Thanks.

And surprise surprise he avoids answering the question again. Expected that much.
 
Damn, did someone just teach you the word logic? You sure are using it a lot recently.



Sorry I mistakenly thought this was a Super 14 thread. I had no idea it was a "Lancelot rocks" thread. Sorry. Because I mistakenly thought it was a Super 14 thread I thought it would be on topic to mention that even in news reports on the Terreblanche funeral the Super 14 rugby was raised. Could people please give their threads more accurate titles in future so I don't make this mistake again? Thanks.

BS Lance..... whatever

have it your way, don't answer our question put to you, and try and justify this whole shying away from legitimate question, with stupid side notes..... [wtf does the AWB member watching rugby have to do with super 14 thread, is your world that boring that you felt that was newsworthy in this thread???]

I'm going to enjoy my weekend now, you do the same...

"lancelot rocks" - VERY VERY VERY :wtf: about this statement????
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X