Ombudsman dismisses DA complaint

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,592
Reaction score
10,236
Location
District 9
The Press Ombudsman cannot judge two journalists for wearing ANC attire because their behaviour was not followed by publication.

This was contained in a finding by Press Ombudsman Johan Retief published on Wednesday.

"Your personal conduct has nothing to do with this office; but if your behaviour is followed by publication, it certainly may have," Retief said.

"The complaint is dismissed."

The Democratic Alliance's national spokeswoman Phumzile van Damme lodged a complaint with the ombudsman against Independent Newspapers group executive editor Karima Brown and opinion and analysis group editor Vukani Mde.

They were pictured on social networks attending the ANC's 103rd birthday in January wearing the party's attire.

"If a journalist's behaviour leads to the publication of whatever, the conduct in question... may come under scrutiny. Otherwise, this office has no jurisdiction over it," said Retief.

Van Damme claimed that because the two had worn African National Congress attire to the birthday celebration in Cape Town, their independence and impartiality had been compromised.

Abigail Oliver, on behalf of Independent Newspapers, argued that Brown and Mde attended the birthday celebration in their personal capacity and neither reported on the event.

Retief said: "As I have no evidence that the journalists attended the celebrations in their professional capacity, or that they have reported or commented on the issue, my only conclusion can be that the reporters' choice of dress is indeed none of this office's business.

"Therefore, I am keeping my opinion on this matter to myself."


Source : Sapa /gq/fg/jje/th
Date : 28 Jan 2015 11:24
 
Agreed - not surprising though that the DA wants to control what you wear...
 
Correct decision, I think. Not something for the Ombudsman to rule on. Their compromised independence is something the public should make its own mind up about.

This works in countries where the average member of the public has more education and intelligence than a braindead squirrel. SA is not one of these countries.
 
Not that, I just don't like them calling themselves independent when they are clearly not.

If their reporting is seen to favour the ANC then that may be a problem.
No person in the history of the world has ever been, or will ever be, 'independent' and 'objective'.
We all have opinions, likes and dislikes, biases and preferences, support some things, and condemn some things.
That's not the problem.
It only becomes an issue if they allow their support of the ANC to effect the independence of their publication and articles, which is when you go to the Ombudsman.
 
:confused: English please. What is public knowledge now? That journalists are *gasp* people with their own opinions and affiliations and biases?

Same goes for members on this forum ....... *gasp* :p
 
Interesting that people still think journalists can be "independent". When a journalist says they are independent, you know they are lying. Nobody is independent when comes to politics. Apathetic maybe.
 
So the complaint is in retaliation for (In)dependent Newspapers firing that business report journalist who applied to be on the DA's list in the last election? Karima Brown is a disgusting brown noser though, she went from being a fierce Mbeki critic (at Business Day) to being brain showered and firmly attached to Numbuh One's rear end. She has no place editing anything.
 
:confused: English please. What is public knowledge now? That journalists are *gasp* people with their own opinions and affiliations and biases?

It is public knowledge now that the Independent group are no longer "independent".
Meaning, they are no longer objective and unbiased.
Couldn't be more obvious.
 
It is public knowledge now that the Independent group are no longer "independent".
Meaning, they are no longer objective and unbiased.
Couldn't be more obvious.

I just thought it was common knowledge that the media in it's entirety is not, and cannot be, objective and unbiased.
It's impossible, how could it be unless run entirely by computers without any human input whatsoever.
It's really naive to think there is such a thing as an unbiased and objective media group, never mind the "no longer" bit.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X