David
Well-Known Member
Have been doing a lot of reading on FTTH and researching the various players in the Open Access Fibre space, in an effort to try to better understand FTTH and what open access really means. in the European FTTH handbook, they describe open access as follows:
"The term “open access” implies a resource that is made available to clients, other than the owner, on
fair and non-discriminatory terms; in other words, the price for access is the same for all clients and
is hopefully less than the cost of building a separate infrastructure...."
It goes on to describe the differences between Passive open access infrastructure and Active open access infrastructures. (Page 16 for those interested in reading this document)
Based on this, I am starting to wonder just how "open" open actually is and are all the various players, currently given equal "rights" to the various open access infrastructure owners networks?
Also I am sure their are ICASA license of some sort in place between various players in this space, so does anyone know what would differentiate a Open Access Infrastructure owner from and actual ISP?
"The term “open access” implies a resource that is made available to clients, other than the owner, on
fair and non-discriminatory terms; in other words, the price for access is the same for all clients and
is hopefully less than the cost of building a separate infrastructure...."
It goes on to describe the differences between Passive open access infrastructure and Active open access infrastructures. (Page 16 for those interested in reading this document)
Based on this, I am starting to wonder just how "open" open actually is and are all the various players, currently given equal "rights" to the various open access infrastructure owners networks?
Also I am sure their are ICASA license of some sort in place between various players in this space, so does anyone know what would differentiate a Open Access Infrastructure owner from and actual ISP?