[Opinion] A theory about having babies

jack_spratt

Expert Member
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
4,556
One of the most underappreciated facts about the last half of the 20th century was the global decline in fertility rates. In 1950, the average woman had around 5 children.
Today it’s less than 2.5. The implication is that women’s fertility rates can fall rapidly; it took 95 years in the UK for the fertility rate to fall from 6 to 3 children per woman (from 1815 to 1910), yet only 20 years in Bangladesh (1982 to 2002).

Link
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
It is also all the exogenus estrogen in the water/packaging and plastic leeching into water , coupled with the fact that normal male testosterone levels have been getting lowered by the medical profession. ie - it used to be 900 per n/l and now normal is 400 per n/l , and doctors are not very keen to prescribe anything to sort out male test production for fear of creating roided out murderers.(completely based in fiction)
 

Ancalagon

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 23, 2010
Messages
18,140
Fertility is going to fall off a cliff in the next 10 years - it is going to be way below replacement rate in first world countries.

In 100 years from now, people speaking one of Russian, Arabic or Chinese will be discussing the fall of Western civilisation.
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,937
Good news for a change.

Global decline in children will force us to rethink our current models of life , economics, industry, social structures and our roles within society.
Change is overdue.
 

TribbleZA

Honorary Master
Joined
Feb 3, 2014
Messages
31,692
In the past, the only "job" women had was to have babies and be a wife. She has other options now - so there is no need for her hormones/fertility to remain as high. Many women don't even want children or to get married. This is evolution.
 

Zoomzoom

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Messages
5,469
If this is happening to people one has to wonder what is happening to other species reproduction rates.
 

Jabulani22

Executive Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2017
Messages
5,277
Good news for a change.

Global decline in children will force us to rethink our current models of life , economics, industry, social structures and our roles within society.
Change is overdue.
Mostly affects westernised countries , africa and asia are not slowing down at the same rate and indeed they wont because of less exposure to chems and other factors , it will not create a utopia but it will create more poverty as seen by the millions of "refugees" attempting to get into westernised countries.
 

Nanfeishen

Executive Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2006
Messages
8,937
Mostly affects westernised countries , africa and asia are not slowing down at the same rate and indeed they wont because of less exposure to chems and other factors , it will not create a utopia but it will create more poverty as seen by the millions of "refugees" attempting to get into westernised countries.

Africa i would agree , however Asia ? A list of 190 countries , we have Taiwan , Japan, South Korea , Thailand and China all in the lower 40 countries.

Asia specific https://www.indexmundi.com/map/?t=0&v=31&r=as&l=en

Asia is slowing down, simply not at the same rate as Western Europe.
 

johnjm

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2005
Messages
2,541
People had 10 kids back then because half used to die either at birth or as infants.

Looking at my family tree it's sad what they went through in those days, losing babies so often.
 
Top