Oscar Pistorius: The Sentence

[marine1]

But vorster didn't know there was a person there op did
He only fired 1 shot op fired 4
Vorster wanted to scare intruder away op wanted to shoot intruder

 

[The_Ogre]

And the other case he was not disabled

Vorster also didn't know there was someone behind the window (I suspect a curtain obscured his view).

 

[AthenianOwl]

Masipa's successfully trolled us >_<

 

[jacodebeer]

What a sad happening the Voster case

 

[marine1]

What a sad happening the Voster case

Yes very sad indeed

 

[The_Ogre]

But vorster didn't know there was a person there op did
He only fired 1 shot op fired 4
Vorster wanted to scare intruder away op wanted to shoot intruder

Snap

 

[MickeyD]

JAIL!!!!

 

[SlowInternet]

Jail here we come.

 

[Replay]

 

[satanboy]

Who is the tall, blonde fidgeting man in the front row? Also keeps talking.

 

[AthenianOwl]

BREAKING NEWS: NO HOUSE ARREST FOR OSCAR PISTORUS!!!!

Degree of negligence in this matter means house arrest would not be appropriate

 

[SlowInternet]

Masipa -The recommendations proposed by Maringa and Vergeer are not appropriate

yup

 

[MickeyD]

Who is the tall, blonde fidgeting man in the front row? Also keeps talking.

Mark Batchelor (black shirt?)

 

[marine1]

Who is the tall, blonde fidgeting man in the front row? Also keeps talking.

Not sure pic ? Perhaps?

 

[marine1]

Not mark bachelor?

 

[Nom Chompsky]

Vorster case was “dissimilar” to Pistorius’s case, though, the judge goes on. Vorster did not have a disability. Vorster did not know there was a person behind the door when he fired – Pistorius did.

Only one shot was fired by Vorster, and was not aimed at the door. Pistorius “deliberately fired four shots into the door”.

Vorster aimed to frighten away the supposed intruder; Pistorius’s intention was to shoot the apparent intruder.

Pistorius could have escaped the threat, she adds.

Pistorius was trained in the use of firearms – a “high degree of responsibility” should be expected of such a person.

Nicely summed differences of the two cases...

 

[Drifter]

Sentence suggested by defence witnesses NOT APPROPRIATE.

 

[Replay]

Who is the tall, blonde fidgeting man in the front row? Also keeps talking.

You like him do you?

 

[satanboy]

Mark Batchelor (black shirt?)

Yes, thanks. He clearly has no respect for the court.

 

[marine1]

Yes, thanks. He clearly has no respect for the court.

Are you joking? He has no respect for anyone or anything