Overclocking GTX 970 - Share your clocks!

AlexGouws

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2014
Messages
303
Reaction score
0
Location
Joburg
Hey guys.

So I decided today to overclock my MSI GTX 970 GPU to squeeze out every last bit of performance it has! This is an amazing card to OC! I was able to up my Core clock by +165MHz and Mem clock to +510MHz. Power Limit is at 110% and Voltage is sitting at 1.250v

I can squeeze a bit more out of the Core and Mem clocks, but I end up getting artifacts in Unigene Heaven. Haven't tested the OC extensively on games so far. Would you consider this OC as good/bad/average/decent?

If you have a GTX 970 (or 980 or whatever!) post your OC results here! :)
 
Your values mean jack as all these cards have different base clocks from the manufacturer.

You need to provide your final core boost clock, mem clock. power limit & voltage for it all to make sense.
 
Your values mean jack as all these cards have different base clocks from the manufacturer.

You need to provide your final core boost clock, mem clock. power limit & voltage for it all to make sense.

Yep.
 
Your values mean jack as all these cards have different base clocks from the manufacturer.

You need to provide your final core boost clock, mem clock. power limit & voltage for it all to make sense.

And any extra cooling.
 
Galax GTX 960 EXOC 2GB

Core Boost: 1555MHz
Mem Boost: 8000MHz
Power Limit: 122%
Vcore: 0V adjustment (I should probably play around with this)
Cooling: Stock, fan speed set to 60% (willl get the rpm & update)
 
Last edited:
I had msi gaming 970 running around 1500mhz boost ,and the evga ftw was running around 1480mhz boost.

Both was battlefield stable.
 
Your values mean jack as all these cards have different base clocks from the manufacturer.

You need to provide your final core boost clock, mem clock. power limit & voltage for it all to make sense.

Sorry man! My bad.

Core boost: 1501Mhz
Memory boost: 8000Mhz
Power limit: 110%
Voltage: 1.250v

Galax GTX 960 EXOC 2GB

Core Boost: 1555MHz
Mem Boost: 8000MHz
Power Limit: 122%
Vcore: 0V adjustment (I should probably play around with this)
Cooling: Stock, fan speed set to 60% (willl get the rpm & update)

Damn that's good man! I think if the GTx 970's had a power limit of 125% I might be able to get it up to 1.6Ghz
 
Last edited:
I'm a bit unhappy with my 960. I will sell it next week or 2 and buy either a 970 or 290x tri.
 
What cooling are you guys using and what temps is your card running?
I get 75c with my MSI gtx 970 gaming during a stress test. Nothing tampered with
 
What cooling are you guys using and what temps is your card running?
I get 75c with my MSI gtx 970 gaming during a stress test. Nothing tampered with

Wow that seems extremely high. I use the normal Twin Frozr V on my 970. I have never ever gotten above 70c while gaming nor overclocking. Think 70 was the highest I ever saw and my GPU was also overclocked. Usually when I game I get about 65c average on OC and about low 60s on no OC with the fan set to auto on MSI Afterburner. Where do you live? Are you in a small room that doesn't have a lot of airflow? What chassis are you using? And is your fan set to auto? Maybe try upping your fan RPM in Afterburner.
 
What are you unhappy about? That resolution should yield you a few fps as well.

I agree. That's a pretty nice card. I recently built a mid range gaming pc for a client with a Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 and it performed even better than I thought on games! Can play most games on High @ 60fps. (Change a few settings though, like no AA, etc.) And he was playing on a 1080p monitor.
 
I agree. That's a pretty nice card. I recently built a mid range gaming pc for a client with a Gigabyte GTX 960 G1 and it performed even better than I thought on games! Can play most games on High @ 60fps. (Change a few settings though, like no AA, etc.) And he was playing on a 1080p monitor.

The problem is everybody wants to gooi all the sliders to the right without looking at the visuals & impact. Even a gtx 980 is gonna struggle in some games to give you a solid 60 fps when you do so. Some of the gfx options add nothing to the game or actaully make it look worse as far as I'm concerned, things like motion blur, depth of field, chromatic aberations, vignetting actually detracts from a game. Then you have AA where people turn it up to max msaa+txaa etc and the entire image becomes 'soft', an out of focus look. Some people I can understand like this but I don't wanna play my games that way, even if I had a Titan X I would disable those features.

The thing that pisses me off with game developers is they dance to the tune of gpu manufacturers and include their crap while excluding other useful technologies. You pay a heavy tax for nvidia gameworks, TressFX for example has less of a hit than nVidia Hairworks, many games you will see the option of FXAA AA from nVidia which sucks donkey balls, the free to use SMAA kicks it's ass and looks really good without the heavy GPU tax of MSAA etc (i'm not saying it's as good as MSAA but it kicks the pants off blurry FXAA). Every game out there should have the option of using SMAA I reckon. When moving around in a game I doubt many people would notice a difference between SSAO and HBAO+ which also has a GPU tax.

Before people start to play a game they should look at the nVidia tweak guides to see the impact of the various settings on fps & whether you would actually notice the visual change.

All my games I disable the ingame AA and inject SMAA via SweetFX, I wish all developers would offer SMAA as a standard option. nVidia geforce experience is a crock of schite as they enable nvidia technologies and turn down all the other settings, you can do much better manually editing your own settings.

How is it that CDPR can have a game running at 4k resolution only using 1.8GB of VRAM looking stunning while other companies have you chowing VRAM and you have to start turning down texture quality etc?
 
Last edited:
I've decided to upgrade my +7 year old LCD monitor. Still deciding whether to go with 1080p or 1440p.

Im rather happy with 1080P, i dont see a need to get a monitor that will display 1440 or 4K.

If i was upgrading my PC, the monitor would be the least of my worries.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X