Panel affects bond auction: SANRAL

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,430
Reaction score
9,944
Location
District 9
The SA National Roads Agency Limited (Sanral) blamed the e-tolls review panel for negatively affecting the agency's final bond auction for the year on Wednesday.

"Investor confidence in Sanral has been negatively impacted by the uncertainty created by the Gauteng government's decision to set up an e-toll review panel," a statement said.

Sanral sought to raise at least R500 million, as the next auction was scheduled only for February 2015, Sanral said in a statement.

"Even though total bids of R765m were received the prices were much wider than the guidance and therefore only R415m was allocated."

A bond is a debt investment where an investor lends money to an entity which borrows the money for a set time period at a fixed interest rate.

Bonds are used by companies and different levels of government to finance different projects and activities.

Sanral said the lack of investor interest was unfortunate given the presentations made by Transport Minister Dipuo Peter and senior government officials to the panel over the past two days.

"The minister expressed strong support for Sanral indicating that the e-toll system in Gauteng will continue in terms of decisions taken by the Cabinet," the agency said.

"The result of this auction once again demonstrated the close relationship between government decisions and Sanral, as a government implementing agency."

Sanral chief financial officer Inge Mulder said: "Investors are sensitive to policy uncertainty and they clearly communicated this today."

She trusted Peters's "strong endorsement" of the agency to the panel on Tuesday, and her assurance of government support, would reduce future uncertainties and draw investors back to future auctions.

Mulder said Sanral would continue to do their best to ensure they produced and maintained roads that were safe, time effective, and cost effective to use.

At the panel on Wednesday, transport department acting director general Mawethu Vilana said price inflation could not be blamed on the cost of Gauteng's e-tolls.

"If there are problems in the pricing structure, it is not an e-toll problem," Vilana told the panel in Pretoria.

Trucking and goods companies decided on prices and were in the wrong if they decided to impose exorbitant prices due to the tolls, he said.

One of the arguments against the electronic tolling system had been that it would increase the prices of goods transported by road.

Vilana argued that if a truck paid R1.50 per gantry the cost of a single item in the truck should not be increased by that amount. Instead the R1.50 should be spread across all the goods in the truck.

"But it just can't be an e-toll problem," said Vilana, adding that goods pricing fell out of his department's jurisdiction.

Vilana was answering questions from the panel appointed by Gauteng premier David Makhura in July to review the tolling system.

It was set up to examine the economic and social impact of the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project and the e-tolling system set up to fund it.

The panel was expected to present its findings to Makhura at the end of the month.


Source : Sapa /aw/nsm/jje/jk
Date : 05 Nov 2014 13:53
 
The Vilana argued that if a truck paid R1.50 per gantry the cost of a single item in the truck should not be increased by that amount. Instead the R1.50 should be spread across all the goods in the truck.


Date : 05 Nov 2014 13:53

Which gantry costs only R1.50 for a truck? And how many trips only result in a single gantry passage? Are all the trucks left at the destination?
 
Trucks don't pay R1.50 per toll gate, it is more like 10X that.

They recently invoiced my Toyota as a Mac Truck (photo), and it was about R17 for one gate.

And I am sure that it adds up.

And IMO their debts costs should be higher, they have not been playing on a level playing field.

And as far as I am concerned, this owner pays system should fail.

Only physical toll gates can be user pays.
 
SANRAL SAYS MEDIA REPORTS WRONG: SAPA STANDS FIRM

Inaccurate reporting by the media fed misperceptions about the e-tolls system, Sanral CEO Nazir Alli complained on Thursday.

Before continuing the SA National Road Agency Limited's (Sanral) presentation to the e-tolls review panel in Pretoria, Alli said he was disappointed when he saw a newspaper story indicating that Sanral was "broke".

The Star newspaper reported on Thursday morning Sanral had told the panel on Wednesday that it was broke and warned the country would be in serious trouble if it was not able to pay off its R20 billion debt.

Elements of the Sapa news agency's reports from the hearings on Wednesday were incorporated into the newspaper report. These included a statement by Alli that South Africa would be in "serious trouble" if the e-tolling debt was not settled, and that "there is no new money".

The Star reported that in Transport Minister Dipuo Peters's presentation to the panel on Tuesday, she said motorists could pay up to an extra R3.65 per litre of petrol to repay the debt.

Alli said at no point had the minister ever said that was what was needed to repay the debt on the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP).

"This is how perceptions are created, by misinformation, then we have to deal with how you try and regress the entrenched views that are created by misrepresentation," he said, showing a copy of The Star newspaper to the panel.

"...To deliberately not check your facts and turn around and call our [transport] minister a liar and deliberately mislead the public, I think is unfair and uncalled for."

He appealed through the panel that they ask the newspaper to print a correction.

Sapa editor Mark van der Velden said the news agency stood by its own reporting on the hearings and that Sapa had never reported Sanral saying it was "broke".

"That would have been an interpretation based on the statements reported," he said.

Sanral on Thursday employed a prominent public relations firm to issue a lengthy and urgent press statement claiming the reports showed "a lamentable understanding of the business".

Van der Velden said Sanral was misdirected in asking the review panel to order a correction just because it claimed the reports were wrong.

"It is welcome to rather take the issue to the Press Ombudsman, who would look at the issues objectively."

The panel was established by Gauteng premier David Makhura to examine the socio-economic impact of the GFIP and the electronic tolling system set up to fund it.


Source : Sapa /aw/jje/jk
Date : 06 Nov 2014 13:03
 
snot & trane.jpg

Not being able to fix a millimetre of road without the money from e-tolls sounds broke to me, 'cos there's not way in hell we're going to pay for it.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X