Penis Worms Help Solve Evolutionary Puzzle

[be.plato]

You didn't answer my question:
Did you bother to go and do you own research on the evolution of the eye like I told you to in the last thread where you said you wanted to get to grips with evolutionary theories?

If your answer is "no" then yes I agree it is going to be a very long process. Infinite would be my guess.

Not really an infinite process. I am also currently looking into abiogenesis in my hectic schedule.

From your thread posts it appears you are quite knowledgeable, are you studying the subject? Or is it personal research? If you are currently in the field then of course you will understand the various theories better than most, so be patient.

 

[Bar0n]

if you move half the distance from a wall closer to the wall every odd minute, will you ever touch the wall?

Don't know what your point is with this, but yes you will.

Since the common ratio is less than one, the series must converge to a sum.

 

[porchrat]

Not really an infinite process. I am also currently looking into abiogenesis in my hectic schedule.

From your thread posts it appears you are quite knowledgeable, are you studying the subject? Or is it personal research? If you are currently in the field then of course you will understand the various theories better than most, so be patient.

When it come to evolutionary biology it is mostly my own research. I took an introductory Biology course in 1st year uni but then again at least half the people that have ever attended any science faculty of any university can say that. That course just covered some basics like geological eras and some of the interesting characteristics of specific flora and fauna we find on this planet... nothing you couldn't pick up quickly in your own work, heck a lot of it was covered in high school.

That and a lot of the stuff I covered at uni has since been put aside for more modern theories. Archaeopteryx is a good example. We learnt about that particular creature in that class but it is now being displaced in the scientific community by another more likely candidate (from China I think? I have the article lying about somewhere, it also has a crazy name).

My point stands regardless. If you aren't prepared to do the reading then you won't learn. I do certainly hope you do the research and improve your knowledge but ultimately all I can do is hope. I can't improve your knowledge for you. I do ask that you not reject something as untrue until you actually know what it is and understand the arguments being made and the evidence that is out there. There are millions of creationists out there that do that and frankly the whole lot of them are utter turnip-heads for doing so. What kind of cabbage-brained yahoo rejects something as untrue when he doesn't even know what it is.