Perverted Penguins

[Geriatrix]

I really liked your post I thought I should bring it up.

But where can an atheist look for answers if not penguins?

Well, sheep clearly!

 

[copacetic]

Well, sheep clearly!

That is the purview of the Australian and New Zealand heathens, I think.

 

[STS]

I'm not exactly an expert on sheep, having never really been around them growing up. maybe it's the horns?

otherwise there isn't really homosexuality, necrophilia or pedophilia in nature to animals, they don't care about labels or how society see's them. it's just hanky spanky wherever they can get it

 

[Techne]

Well, sheep clearly!

Only if the sheep are ceilingcat's prophets.

 

[azbob]

Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?

 

[Techne]

Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?

So that is where peeking duck comes from .

 

[buyeye]

Homosexual necrophilia duck. You were saying?

But why is it that you are trying to find a defence for your habits?

Is it because they are wrong:

 

[azbob]

But why is it that you are trying to find a defence for your habits?

Is it because they are wrong:

:wtf: I'm neither homosexual, necrophiliac...nor a water bird. Anyway I'm not part of this thread or discussion, just had an image to share. :wtf:

 

[STS]

:wtf: I'm neither homosexual, necrophiliac...nor a water bird. Anyway I'm not part of this thread or discussion, just had an image to share. :wtf:

come ooon, with your expertise on beasiality you'd be fun to have around

 

[azbob]

come ooon, with your expertise on beasiality you'd be fun to have around

Wakakakakaaa....is the sound the ducks made when they saw me [-]coming[/-] approaching.

 

[Geriatrix]

Only if the sheep are ceilingcat's prophets.

Did you see windowsill-hawk?

 

[Swa]

I'm not exactly an expert on sheep, having never really been around them growing up. maybe it's the horns?

otherwise there isn't really homosexuality, necrophilia or pedophilia in nature to animals, they don't care about labels or how society see's them. it's just hanky spanky wherever they can get it

Fair point. What everyone pointing at nature fails to mention is that there are hierarchies in packs. Often all the females belong to a single alpha male and nobody else is allowed to mate with them. The other hormone driven males have nowhere else to turn except other males. In other groups younger inexperienced males will also practice on each other before moving to older females. Nature is ruled by hormones, homosexuality is not a factor.

 

[Unhappy438]

Fair point. What everyone pointing at nature fails to mention is that there are hierarchies in packs. Often all the females belong to a single alpha male and nobody else is allowed to mate with them. The other hormone driven males have nowhere else to turn except other males. In other groups younger inexperienced males will also practice on each other before moving to older females. Nature is ruled by hormones, homosexuality is not a factor.

So what about all of the homosexual birds, fish, bears, tigers (the list can go on) who are not part of packs?

 

[Geriatrix]

So what about all of the homosexual birds, fish, bears, tigers (the list can go on) who are not part of packs?

They are clearly bad role models.

 

[Unhappy438]

lol , some more info that would go against Swa's theory :

In a review article published in 2009, biologists Nathan Bailey and Marlene Zuk at the University of California, Riverside, noted that “many thousands of instances of same-sex courtship, pair bonding and copulation have been observed in a wide range of species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, mollusks and nematodes.”
Some animals, when given a choice, show a preference for the same sex.

 

[STS]

So what about all of the homosexual birds, fish, bears, tigers (the list can go on) who are not part of packs?

The word of today is: Hanky Panky.

Hanky Panky wherever you can get it!

 

[Unhappy438]

The word of today is: Hanky Panky.

Hanky Panky wherever you can get it!

As i said in my previous post , what about the animals that have equal opportunity to get "hanky panky" from a male or female and end up choosing the same sex animal.

 

[STS]

lol , some more info that would go against Swa's theory :

In a review article published in 2009, biologists Nathan Bailey and Marlene Zuk at the University of California, Riverside, noted that “many thousands of instances of same-sex courtship, pair bonding and copulation have been observed in a wide range of species, including mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, mollusks and nematodes.”
Some animals, when given a choice, show a preference for the same sex.

But not solely driven to go for one sex. Even bisexuals may have a preference for one sex over another, what is the difference between homosexuals and bisexuals?

I saw a pigeon humping a dead pigeon that was hit by a car. Doesn't mean all pigeons are necrophiliacs, it just means that it's a dumb bird that doesn't care

 

[STS]

I think he definition of hetrosexual is that the organism only engages in male to female sex. homosexuality should be excluded to solely male to male or female to female sex. if animals are engaging in all kinds of sexual practices with males and females, it's hard to label them anything

 

[Unhappy438]

But not solely driven to go for one sex. Even bisexuals may have a preference for one sex over another, what is the difference between homosexuals and bisexuals?

So if they have a preference over the same sex then it goes beyond just wanting "hanky panky" as you put it.

I saw a pigeon humping a dead pigeon that was hit by a car. Doesn't mean all pigeons are necrophiliacs, it just means that it's a dumb bird that doesn't care

Strawman