Ping Request

[GougedEye]

Hi guys,

Please oh please could someone with iburst ping " crushbone.everquest2.com " and post the results. It would be very much appreciated.

Thanks,

 

[armitage]

[8D] oh and also if someone would post pings for

157.157.139.10

this is the eve server
Hopefully looking for ping below 350 which im currently getting
consistent mind u

Proud South african rip offs.

 

[Razer0]

Ping statistics for 199.108.202.97:
Packets: Sent = 20, Received = 18, Lost = 2 (10% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 536ms, Maximum = 1561ms, Average = 1092ms

heres mine with sentech.. WHAT A JOKE!!

 

[guest2013-1]

This from my iburst connection :

Pinging ableq2-03-01.everquest2.com [199.108.202.97] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 199.108.202.97: bytes=32 time=358ms TTL=51
Reply from 199.108.202.97: bytes=32 time=317ms TTL=51
Reply from 199.108.202.97: bytes=32 time=346ms TTL=51
Reply from 199.108.202.97: bytes=32 time=331ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 199.108.202.97:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 317ms, Maximum = 358ms, Average = 338ms

Pinging 157.157.139.10 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=332ms TTL=240
Reply from 157.157.139.10: bytes=32 time=320ms TTL=240

Ping statistics for 157.157.139.10:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 320ms, Maximum = 343ms, Average = 330ms

 

[Perdition]

Those are some very decent pings. Let's hope they remain that stable once more people have signed up.

 

[armitage]

hmm 330 thats quite nice
Usually i average at bout 360 which considering to london not too shabby eh nige?
[^]

Thanks for the reply

Proud South african rip offs.

 

[TheRoDent]

PING 157.157.139.10 (157.157.139.10): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=0 ttl=242 time=243.2 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=1 ttl=242 time=216.9 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=2 ttl=242 time=224.2 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=3 ttl=242 time=230.3 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=4 ttl=242 time=232.3 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=5 ttl=242 time=227.7 ms
64 bytes from 157.157.139.10: icmp_seq=6 ttl=242 time=222.5 ms

--- 157.157.139.10 ping statistics ---
7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 216.9/228.1/243.2 ms

Rock the fsck on DataPro

<center><h6> MyWireless <s>Hacks</s> Tweaks & Tech Info || Have you checked the fawking FAQ? <br /> <font color="red">Tired of Sentech's bad service? Want to compare speeds? We at least listen...</font id="red"></h6></center>

 

[GougedEye]

Thanks guys,

Those don't look to bad at all. Of course they haven't started shaping yet, but still, not too shabby.

I see Sentech are maintaining their rock bottom standards. So glad I got out of that joke.

 

[guest2013-1]

I couldn't comment on the shaping, but I hope the do stateful packet inspection rather than shaping all ports except port 80 etc ala Telkom. My sql server in Denver runs on port 1533 and it REALLY rawks connecting to it via iburst.

TheRodent, Datapro rawks, me know []