I watched a programme on discovery last night, which explained the events that led up to the controversial view that Pluto can no longer be considered a planet. It was quite fascinating.
It started with the discovery of the Kuiper belt (collection of objects with the same composition as Pluto, that circulates the entire outer solar system). And thus Pluto is just another object in the Kuiper belt, where they have also discovered objects larger than pluto. But the experts are divided on the issue of pluto retaining its planet status.
Interestingly NASA send a probe to Pluto, before it lost its status (scheduled to arrive in 2015), so they might have just blown a billion on some little obscure object surrounded by lots of more interesting objects and even planets.
The link contains more detailed info. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/10/why-pluto-is-no-longer-a-planet/
It started with the discovery of the Kuiper belt (collection of objects with the same composition as Pluto, that circulates the entire outer solar system). And thus Pluto is just another object in the Kuiper belt, where they have also discovered objects larger than pluto. But the experts are divided on the issue of pluto retaining its planet status.
Interestingly NASA send a probe to Pluto, before it lost its status (scheduled to arrive in 2015), so they might have just blown a billion on some little obscure object surrounded by lots of more interesting objects and even planets.
The link contains more detailed info. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/04/10/why-pluto-is-no-longer-a-planet/