hi guys so my story goes like this.
recently the wife and decided to purchase a property. we have been looking for one for quite some time, and basically everything we find is out of our budget and then still requires TLC in order to get it to a point we want. that being said, we decided to change our focus and rather look at properties that have good flat land however house may need a total redo.
we eventually found something that is way within our budget and we are happy at the current state it is in. our plan literally is to do a full renovation, so the said current structure is not that important to us.
so we do all the nitty gritty work and get bond approval and seller agreeing to a price we offer. however there is now a snag....the bank has requested that we do a engineer structural report on the property and provide a structural clearance certificate for the said building. we obliged and had this done. the report has come back and the repairs suggested include, replacing of the main building roof and also flooring within the main house. i was aware of these items to be seen to, however is didnt think it would matter much, as these items were going to be replaced with the renovations i have in mind.
problem for me now, is that the bank will not grant the bond for this property until these items mentioned have been seen to by the seller. the seller has told me that he would not be fixing these items, as he was already selling the property at a loss, so there was no use in doing repairs. i do agree with him on that point, as i will be just replacing whatever repairs he does do.
the seller has no informed me that he does not have the means to do the repairs as suggested by structural report, and would rather cancel any sale agreement. i have thought of offering to get the repairs done on the building then the costs of it deducted off the sale amount.
would this be a legal or even a good idea on my part? any advise on this would be greatly appreciated.
Mathew
recently the wife and decided to purchase a property. we have been looking for one for quite some time, and basically everything we find is out of our budget and then still requires TLC in order to get it to a point we want. that being said, we decided to change our focus and rather look at properties that have good flat land however house may need a total redo.
we eventually found something that is way within our budget and we are happy at the current state it is in. our plan literally is to do a full renovation, so the said current structure is not that important to us.
so we do all the nitty gritty work and get bond approval and seller agreeing to a price we offer. however there is now a snag....the bank has requested that we do a engineer structural report on the property and provide a structural clearance certificate for the said building. we obliged and had this done. the report has come back and the repairs suggested include, replacing of the main building roof and also flooring within the main house. i was aware of these items to be seen to, however is didnt think it would matter much, as these items were going to be replaced with the renovations i have in mind.
problem for me now, is that the bank will not grant the bond for this property until these items mentioned have been seen to by the seller. the seller has told me that he would not be fixing these items, as he was already selling the property at a loss, so there was no use in doing repairs. i do agree with him on that point, as i will be just replacing whatever repairs he does do.
the seller has no informed me that he does not have the means to do the repairs as suggested by structural report, and would rather cancel any sale agreement. i have thought of offering to get the repairs done on the building then the costs of it deducted off the sale amount.
would this be a legal or even a good idea on my part? any advise on this would be greatly appreciated.
Mathew