Lupus
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2006
- Messages
- 89,900
- Reaction score
- 60,455
By one slot I supposeBetter than stage 4 surely.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
By one slot I supposeBetter than stage 4 surely.
Cape Town is not spared, I have two Stage 2 slots today.
Both possibilities unlikely. The latter is actually likely not possible.5 trips in rapid succession?
2 possibilities - a coordinated sabotage plan, or a cascading fail that they managed to arrest.
Then what then?Both possibilities unlikely. The latter is actually likely not possible.
5 units tripped at 5 power stations.Then what then?
Coincidence then?5 units tripped at 5 power stations.
Old equipment is prone to breakdown and it is not the first they have tripped multiple units within a short period of each. You don't think they all tripped in sync, do you?Coincidence then?
Given the implementation of loadshedding with zero warning (literally), yes I do think they all tripped within minutes of each other.Old equipment is prone to breakdown and it is not the first they have tripped multiple units within a short period of each. You don't think they all tripped in sync, do you?
Or two tripped, then a third, but when 4 and 5 tripped they couldn't hold on any longer. They run the system so that it can withstand a few trips, but margins have become thinner so 5 is a bit much.Given the implementation of loadshedding with zero warning (literally), yes I do think they all tripped within minutes of each other.
Too many of those. And one only per power station x 5 is pure fiction by now.Coincidence then?
I was asking for your theories not just repeating an eskom statement. You disagree with other theories and yet don't provide any alternatives.5 units tripped at 5 power stations.
I do yes. Old equipment in USA seems to work just fine. It's not like we have much to go on. Yes, it's not the first time, it happens all the time. We are saying that they trip because they are overloaded and the circuit breakers trip to protect themselves. You say they are old and just decide to blow steam pipes all at the same time. Which one is more logical?Old equipment is prone to breakdown and it is not the first they have tripped multiple units within a short period of each. You don't think they all tripped in sync, do you?
What do you think happens when they can't reduce the load fast enough when the first 1 or 2 trip?Or two tripped, then a third, but when 4 and 5 tripped they couldn't hold on any longer. They run the system so that it can withstand a few trips, but margins have become thinner so 5 is a bit much.
Isn't that the whole point - how is it that cascading isn't happening here, and then that's the same case at 5 different locations? Doesn't add up.What do you think happens when they can't reduce the load fast enough when the first 1 or 2 trip?
I am not sure why you are still confused. They run at a margin where they can afford a few units tripping at the same demand.What do you think happens when they can't reduce the load fast enough when the first 1 or 2 trip?
Late at night has a 20GW load. We have about 18GW of coal, plus koeberg (1.8) and imports (1.3) minus pumped storage pumping back (2.5) - so we are always on the edge.Isn't that the whole point - how is it that cascading isn't happening here, and then that's the same case at 5 different locations? Doesn't add up.
And late at night? Nah
Doesn't seem to be working.I am not sure why you are still confused. They run at a margin where they can afford a few units tripping at the same demand.
That's because they are flapping about as they dont know WTF is going on...Eskom still hasn't published a more comprehensive state despite promising to do so. 6h and counting...