poweralert....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gas turbines are quite robust, and can run continuously with limited maintenance. They do eventually need to be serviced, probably 8000 hours (1 year) and refurbished after 24,000 hours (3 years). They are modular, and spares are freely available. The main issue is that when run so hard the cost of fuel consumed far exceeds the capital cost...

This link says they last much longer when used continuously compared to stop/start peaking use:
They were serviced recently too so we good for a while now
 
They are running at the 6pm peak just as they were designed for.

The chart that you posted on Thursday shows that many of the OCGTs were running 24 hours a day during most of last week:
1681981742527-png.1511609
 
The chart that you posted on Thursday shows that many of the OCGTs were running 24 hours a day during most of last week:
1681981742527-png.1511609
Yes, but we don't have the chart for the 21st so it's all assumptions and guesses at this point.
 
OCGT are made for quick start, and to be loaded and unloaded as required, it has no direct effect on maintenance. They work best at full load, and are inefficient at part load. Continuous operation is also not an issue, as long as the the required maintenance are done.
Sounds like you're involved, nice to have you aboard the thread.
 
Gas turbines are very powerful but very thirsty machines, so yes, they're more efficient per kWh at high loads, quite literally a better bang for your buck.
 
So Minileccy's great engineering solution is to decrease the sabotage that wasn't a problem, and spend R30bn that we don't have on diesel rather than new capacity...

 
So Minileccy's great engineering solution is to spend R30bn on diesel...

Not defending the Minister's stance here but it should be noted that R30bn is a drop in the ocean compared to lost economic output from higher levels of LS.
 
How does he plan to decrease sabotage? These useless ****s don't understand the difference between an objective and a plan.
 
Not defending the Minister's stance here but it should be noted that R30bn is a drop in the ocean compared to lost economic output from higher levels of LS.
Not for Eskom it isn't. Expect your leccy bill to go up 75% next year.
So Minileccy's great engineering solution is to decrease the sabotage that wasn't a problem, and spend R30bn that we don't have on diesel rather than new capacity...

Minileccy should be ignored for anything he says is meaningless as he has no powers to do anything.
 
Not defending the Minister's stance here but it should be noted that R30bn is a drop in the ocean compared to lost economic output from higher levels of LS.
It's a lot of money for something you'll never get back. New capacity will both recover the capital and drive economic output.

The real solution is to make the tough calls. Cut the redundant leeches, independently review all contracts and contractors and replace them if necessary, freeze all increases, freeze all head count unless critical skills etc
 
So Minileccy's great engineering solution is to decrease the sabotage that wasn't a problem, and spend R30bn that we don't have on diesel rather than new capacity...


New thread created, just to add clutter:
 
WTF
1682229843140.png
1682229886118.png
1682229940714.png
1682229990657.png
 
WTF
View attachment 1513129
View attachment 1513131
View attachment 1513133
View attachment 1513135
I know this is asked quite often... But for us non-electricity-understanding-people, please explain the concern?
 
WTF
View attachment 1513129
View attachment 1513131
View attachment 1513133
View attachment 1513135

Numbers are garbage. Probably spreadsheet error...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X