recre8
Senior Member
After reading another thread today, and once again flaring up my frustration with PEC Metering. I have a few questions regarding the CPA.
Just a bit of background. My entire area (an estate with lots of small complexes in it) has its electricity supplied by PEC metering, which has a pre-paid meter installed in every unit. Eskom places one single meter outside each complex, and then PEC Metering pays this bill by collecting money from the sales of pre-paid electricity. PEC Metering is charged a Inclining Block Tarrif by ESKOM for the entire complex where for example, the first 100 units are 50c the next 200 units are R1 and all units after that is R1.50 (just an example). PEC then recoups the cost by charging each a flat rate of R1.50 per unit regardless of your usage. You can see how they make a profit here. This flat rate is also much higher than ESKOM's highest tariff. I suggest you also read the Hello Peter link further down to read about unethical/illegal disconnections, R400 charges to see your own post-paid meter, and questionable readings etc.
My questions refer to a CPA booklet I downloaded here: http://www.webberwentzel.com/wwb/action/media/downloadFile?media_fileid=6474
1.
The bundling with that specific pre-paid meter forces me to buy electricity from PEC Metering. Does that contravene the above clause in the CPA.
2.
The price is unjust compared to ESKOM and the local municipality. For the same amount of units I use in a average month, I would pay about half.
3. Is there a law stating that profit may not be made from electricity reselling?
I have tried complaining to PEC Metering. They responded it is not a viable business model to charge less. I have now tried for 6 months to get a response from NERSA, but they simply responded that they are aware of the situation and has been for a very long time, but there is no solution yet. I have tried contacting my political party for possible assistance, but it doesn't seem like I will be getting a reponse there either. If anyone has any advice about how to solve this, please let me know. Perhaps even if you know anyone in the press who can help out.
I know that R250 a month extra for electricity isn't all that much, but just the principle of being forced to buy electricity from a company with a shameful track record, incredibly slow responses and excessively rude responses, all while paying twice what everyone else does is making my blood boil.
Just a bit of background. My entire area (an estate with lots of small complexes in it) has its electricity supplied by PEC metering, which has a pre-paid meter installed in every unit. Eskom places one single meter outside each complex, and then PEC Metering pays this bill by collecting money from the sales of pre-paid electricity. PEC Metering is charged a Inclining Block Tarrif by ESKOM for the entire complex where for example, the first 100 units are 50c the next 200 units are R1 and all units after that is R1.50 (just an example). PEC then recoups the cost by charging each a flat rate of R1.50 per unit regardless of your usage. You can see how they make a profit here. This flat rate is also much higher than ESKOM's highest tariff. I suggest you also read the Hello Peter link further down to read about unethical/illegal disconnections, R400 charges to see your own post-paid meter, and questionable readings etc.
My questions refer to a CPA booklet I downloaded here: http://www.webberwentzel.com/wwb/action/media/downloadFile?media_fileid=6474
1.
10.1 The right to select its suppliers:
• the Act imposes various restrictions on the bundling of products. A supplier
is prohibited from requiring a consumer, as a prerequisite to concluding a
contract, to purchase any other particular goods or services from that
supplier, or a designated third party, unless the convenience or economic
6 7 benefit to the consumer outweighs the limitation on the consumer’s right to
choose or the bundled goods or services are also offered separately and
at individual prices;
The bundling with that specific pre-paid meter forces me to buy electricity from PEC Metering. Does that contravene the above clause in the CPA.
2.
14.1 The Act provides that a supplier may not:
• offer to supply, supply or enter into an agreement to supply goods or
services, on terms that are unfair, unreasonable or unjust, or at a price
which is unfair, unreasonable or unjust
The price is unjust compared to ESKOM and the local municipality. For the same amount of units I use in a average month, I would pay about half.
3. Is there a law stating that profit may not be made from electricity reselling?
I have tried complaining to PEC Metering. They responded it is not a viable business model to charge less. I have now tried for 6 months to get a response from NERSA, but they simply responded that they are aware of the situation and has been for a very long time, but there is no solution yet. I have tried contacting my political party for possible assistance, but it doesn't seem like I will be getting a reponse there either. If anyone has any advice about how to solve this, please let me know. Perhaps even if you know anyone in the press who can help out.
I know that R250 a month extra for electricity isn't all that much, but just the principle of being forced to buy electricity from a company with a shameful track record, incredibly slow responses and excessively rude responses, all while paying twice what everyone else does is making my blood boil.