preparing for a nuclear holocaust

halicon said:
America is angry

"yeeehaw!" said the cowboy as it shot the indian in the back in self defense.

http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1920624,00.html
Click to expand...
Shot him in the back as he was running as precaution as he would return and kill him and his family if he did not. Diplomacy would not have worked here either! All wars are brutal even the African wars between the natives at that time were brutal and unfounded! So why hammer the Cowboy. Heehaw! That's why Bush should sort out the extremists and rogue countries to prevent a holocaust. Diplomacy never worked with rogues as it would not have with the Indians!
 
Last edited:
The big problem is this, IRAN persident saiz ISRAEL should not exist and be wiped off the map followed by them persuing nuclear weapons.
 
Vio said:
The big problem is this, IRAN persident saiz ISRAEL should not exist and be wiped off the map followed by them persuing nuclear weapons.
Click to expand...
Yeah and now some zealots here claims that the West must have dialogue with them, "Diplomacy" thats what they call it! Would diplomacy have worked with Iraq? did it work with Korea? Will it work with Iran. NO! Diplomacy cannot work with extremists and rogues or Palestinians. Simply as the fact that diplomacy do not work if you have a delinquent kid or groups with extremist ideas only where there is common grounds for agreement, to agree to disagree!
 
Last edited:
halicon said:
phew, you are not the sharpest knife in the draw today.
you make the perfect american bush supporter! :D
Click to expand...
Thanx! it was deliberate, and at least also not the bluntest. as that is reserved for the TK thread me think! (Joking) American Yes Bush, well I actually do not like the guy, Admire his guts that's it. For me Clinton was the man, tho would not know what he would have done, Then off course peanut farmer would have given it all away! It just comical on this forum how everything happening is blamed either on the USA, Apartheid, The previous regime, The white Afrikaner....etc. They are all made the scapegoats for lack of Governance, financial creative Fcuckups and hammered as racists if they differ from opinion!
 
Rogue nations, power hungry megalomaniacs, politicians, terrorists, criminals, dictators, racists, oil tycoons and telkom, in the words of the great Emperor Palpatine, "Wipe them out, ALL of them".
 
Nanfeishen said:
Rogue nations, power hungry megalomaniacs, politicians, terrorists, criminals, dictators, racists, oil tycoons and telkom, in the words of the great Emperor Palpatine, "Wipe them out, ALL of them".
Click to expand...

LOL that is quite funny, because "Wipe them out, ALL of them" is something that one of those ppl you describe would do :)

You know Iran is perusing nuclear weapons but they say it’s for "peaceful purposes", the Nazi’s used the exact same tactic before the start of WWII.

I feel that any country with "radical/extremist" views should be crushed if they threaten the safety of the international community.

Another example of this is hamas in palatine, sure they where democratically elected, but that means they must act responsibly, hell Hitler was democratically elected...
 
and so was george bush democratically elected. funny how its OKAY if usa attack any nation on earth... but not OKAY if another country decides to attack someone....

because somehow america are not radical extremists?!? :confused:

after IRAQ and their failure to prove or justify the war? pfft... the only extreme and radical country so far has been america.
 
halicon said:
and so was george bush democratically elected. funny how its OKAY if usa attack any nation on earth... but not OKAY if another country decides to attack someone....

because somehow america are not radical extremists?!? :confused:

after IRAQ and their failure to prove or justify the war? pfft... the only extreme and radical country so far has been america.
Click to expand...
USA do it with their own and others interests at heart! I fully support that "preventative" measure and hope there will be another soon. USA kept the peace in this world at large since 1945. Due to their actions and policy's. Due to guys like you an rogue nation will someday, sooner than later start the next WWIII, not USA.
 
Last edited:
So if the Iranian gov. had to eventually build a nuke or two, what would be the risk of them using them? Surely even a hard core Jihaddi understands the concept of MAD (mutually assured destruction)?

Would they be that doff to attack either of their 2 arch enemies, US or Israel? They must know that retribution would be swift and overwhelmingly disproportionate. Even if they conspired with an 'independant' group and gave them the ability to set of a nuke in the above 2, both would hold them accountable anyway.

Surely they understand there's a big difference between martyring a few 'warriors' and martyring your entire nation?
 
Roman4604 said:
So if the Iranian gov. had to eventually build a nuke or two, what would be the risk of them using them? Surely even a hard core Jihaddi understands the concept of MAD (mutually assured destruction)?

Would they be that doff to attack either of their 2 arch enemies, US or Israel? They must know that retribution would be swift and overwhelmingly disproportionate. Even if they conspired with an 'independant' group and gave them the ability to set of a nuke in the above 2, both would hold them accountable anyway.

Surely they understand there's a big difference between martyring a few 'warriors' and martyring your entire nation?
Click to expand...

i think america painted itself a target when it started jumping up and down wanting to play cowboys and arabs.
 
halicon said:
i think america painted itself a target when it started jumping up and down wanting to play cowboys and arabs.
Click to expand...
Question remains would they actually do it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X