Some of the RARBG releases are from low tiers sites such as IPT (MeGusta, EVO etc).
Scene releases also aren't nearly as good as encode groups from some of the PTs I mentioned. There's a couple reasons for this but it mostly comes down to how scene operates in terms of PRE times. Scene isn't too concerned with quality as much as beating the other groups to release. There is a minor difference between Scene and P2P in terms of WEB-DLs but there is a major difference between them with encodes. I won't go into all the differences but the easiest one to think about that relates to both is HDR. Hybrids did not exist in Scene till the rules revision last year (which only applies to encodes):
High Definition x264 and Ultra High Definition x265 Standards Addendum 1 Revision 5.0 Addendum 1 - 2022-10-18
and typically speaking source doesn't matter as much when it comes to WEB-DLs. This is a big problem as there are many cases in the P2P PT world where a release needs to be repacked due to a better source appearing. For example Linux.ISO.2160p.DoVi.H.265-Netflix in many cases has a lower bitrate than Linux.ISO.2160p.DoVi.H.265-DSNP or Linux.ISO.2160p.DoVi.H.265-iTunes, so a repack is needed to ensure the best quality source is ripped. Since scene doesn't do hybrid WEB-DLs you can't get a DoVi release with HDR10 fallback. As for encodes without going into extreme detail the major difference is the lack of usage around Avisynth+ or Vapoursynth and usually okay x264 or x265 settings to ensure acceptable quality and quick pretimes. There are many cases where an encode requires some form of filtering due to a number of potential artifacts such as dirty lines, banding, blocking, halo/ringing etc.
Hope this helps a bit.
Fair points but honestly for me I'm not that deep into private encode groups vs scene vs p2p. I do actually like the DV fallback to HDR releases. If these releases are faulty they will get nuked anyways.
