If the time comes to get an electrical certificate, the presence of low voltage cable in the same tube as mains will fail until it is removed
Well, my entire house is cabled every single room. I ran it all myself. But I can't speak with experience about the degradation because I religiously avoided any power cables. I just ran it through the roof then chased the wires into the corners and painted over it. I avoided the power cables because of everything I had ever read about it.Well, those electricians are scum anyway, I had to redo my electrical certificate after one was issued after finding more than 3 grounding issues. I doubt they check for anything.
@LazyLion, a dude on this thread said he did the same with 0 degradation. Are you just googling the answer and regurgitating what you read? or do you speak from experience?
How would you go about wiring up a place with network cable where there isn't separate conduits for each?
16 x 16 trunking, you'll not even notice it after a week or so.
I would be inclined to stick with the power line solution. The tech is improving all the time...
http://shop.dbg.co.za/tl-pa8030pk.html
Won't be long before the AV2000 starts locally either...
http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/review/p...-av2000-powerline-starter-kit-review-3643494/
Well, my entire house is cabled every single room. I ran it all myself. But I can't speak with experience about the degradation because I religiously avoided any power cables. I just ran it through the roof then chased the wires into the corners and painted over it. I avoided the power cables because of everything I had ever read about it.
My network runs at gigabit speeds so I'm happy with it.
So yeah, sorry. I don't have any experience with degradation.
Also CAT6A is not necessarily shielded, you have to get FTP or S/FTP. I've installed normal CAT6 UTP with power cables before without any problems, but this was just for temporary setup.
As have been said already this is certainly not recommended due to COC and insurance issues should the place burn down. I will not do it in my own house anyway.
Can you guarantee a speed improvement if I buy another power line solution? The one I have is 500mbps, so I'm assuming if 500mbps gives me 20-ish mbps real-world speed, that I would need a unit rated for 5 Gigabytes to achieve 200mbps?
The chances of a spike in the 220VAC causing electro-magnetic interference and 'jumping' onto the lower voltage line of the networking cable is high.
What sort of distances are we looking to cover from router to rooms?
I reckon you would get your full 100Mbps fibre internet speeds and around 30Mbps on a file transfer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDt77CBoZxY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQy4MimoJ1w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i80X99Gdcw4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTgHSV8rEso
Dude, I just realized I might have mistaken Mbps for MB/sSo if I'm getting 20-23 MB/s, that means I'm achieving above 200Mbps speeds with my 500Mbps TPLink units.
Thanks for this input, it makes sense now why you wouldn't want to do it.
Dude, I just realized I might have mistaken Mbps for MB/sSo if I'm getting 20-23 MB/s, that means I'm achieving above 200Mbps speeds with my 500Mbps TPLink units.
Maybe I should concentrate on my kitchen instead![]()
Have you thought about running with fibre? Some of the newer Mikrotik/Ubiquiti routers supports fibre. As I understand it, you may run fibre in the electrical conduit.
Just an idea...
As many have pointed out, it is a bad idea to do this, from a legal view as well as from a practical point of view.
Sure fibre sorts out the risks of interference BUT how do you expect to get to points you want to without going through your DB ?
go to a manufacture such as CBI and see the neat fibre available that can be used for a fibre installation.
Can't you just install a router by the DB instead?
Fibre does sound like an option![]()