Rabbi steps down over paedophile comments

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,422
Reaction score
9,942
Location
District 9
The director of an ultra-orthodox yeshiva in Sydney resigned Wednesday after his comments on paedophiles and apparent tolerance of historical child sex abuse caused an outcry.

Rabbi Yosef Feldman last week said not all sex abuse cases warranted police intervention and that courts could offer leniency to paedophiles who now no longer offend, in comments to the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse.

He apologized Wednesday to the Jewish community and the wider Australian community and said he would step down, The Australian Jewish News reported.

His testimony came as the national inquiry honed in on instances of sexual assault on children at yeshiva-run schools and other Jewish institutes in Australia.

The rabbi also said when he was informed of an alleged case at the yeshiva in 2002, he did not know it could be a crime for an adult to touch the genitals of a child.

The Council of Orthodox Synagogues of Australia strongly criticized Feldman and said his statements showed he was no longer fit to serve the community.

Rabbi Feldman is still the rabbi of the Southern Sydney Synagogue, Jewish News reported, quoting unnamed sources as saying that the local board would discuss his future in the coming days.

Victims of abuse at Jewish schools over the past few decades, who had testified of cover-ups by religious leaders, also expressed outrage.


Source : Sapa-dpa /ma
Date : 11 Feb 2015 10:10
 
he did not know it could be a crime for an adult to touch the genitals of a child.

Oi vey! It shouldn't have to be a crime, you should know it's wrong out of principle, you sick ****.
 
WTF??

How can he say something like that and not know it's so ****ed up?

What possible reason could he have in his ****ed up demonic brain that could make it acceptable?
 
Oi vey! It shouldn't have to be a crime, you should know it's wrong out of principle, you sick ****.

I think for Rabbis is it bit harder as they do the circumcision themselves. So I can understand the quoted part to a very slight degree. But touching a pecker to cut of the hood and touching it to fiddle is 2 completely different things...
 
Last edited:
Then there's this...

Wiki

Under Jewish law, a mohel must draw blood from the circumcision wound. Most mohels do it by hand with a suction device, but some Orthodox groups use their mouth to draw blood after cutting the foreskin
 
Under Jewish law, a mohel must draw blood from the circumcision wound. Most mohels do it by hand with a suction device, but some Orthodox groups use their mouth to draw blood after cutting the foreskin

That's enough internets for today.

>>Start Menu
>> Shut Down
 
http://www.jpost.com/Breaking-News/...tice-infects-New-York-baby-with-herpes-385675

A controversial circumcision practice has led to the infection of a New York City baby with neonatal herpes, according to the city’s health department.

The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene announced Tuesday in a press release that the case was reported in November and resulted “following ritual Jewish circumcision with direct orogenital suction,” a practice known as metzitzah b’peh. This is the fourth such case in 2014 and the 17th since 2000, according to the health department. Two of those cases have resulted in death and another two in brain damage.

Metzitzah b’peh, in which the mohel sucks blood from the wound following circumcision, is a common traditional practice among many haredi Orthodox mohels. When performed directly with the mouth (as opposed to through a sterile pipette), it has been directly linked to the transmission of the herpes virus. New York City health department regulations require the parents of a child to provide prior written consent for the practice, but the regulation has not been enforced.
 
Then there's this...

Wiki

rvrZfYQ.jpg
 
I think for Rabbis is it bit harder as they do the circumcision themselves. So I can understand the quoted part to a very slight degree. But touching a pecker to cut of the hood and touching it to fiddle is 2 completely different things...

I don't see the difference to be honest.

Actually I do, cutting bits of it off is far worse than just fondling.

But hey sky daddy demands foreskins and blood so what do I know? Apparently we should respect people's ****ed up beliefs.
 
I don't see the difference to be honest.

Actually I do, cutting bits of it off is far worse than just fondling.

But hey sky daddy demands foreskins and blood so what do I know? Apparently we should respect people's ****ed up beliefs.

I don't agree with it what so ever!. But in their religion they touch peckers of young babies.
 
I wonder, does this so called God that expects foreskins; store them in a special pouch?
I bet it looks like a scrotum, so that will be like a tip within a scrotum, dickception?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X