Seriously
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2012
- Messages
- 16,595
- Reaction score
- 220
Off course indeed. What a clever and logic model indeed. .... but ..... but ..... You do know that there are prime examples where the model you were punting (highlighted) already exist where power stations have their own coalmines in their back yard feeding coal with conveyors. Yet those mines were purposely neglected and thus became inefficient thus the powers stations in question do indeed rather purchase coal by the truckload transported via road at possibly the prearanged ANC Gupta contracted prices for their required coal. So why is that now suddenly the main consideration and game clincher. ?The plant is being planned for years, building a mine close to a plant makes sense yes (but let's not do it, truck coal for 500kms and pay triple the price no?).
But hey, keep on bashing on investment in your country and then moan when there's no investment...
The net effect of the ANC Gupta contracts was that even any small factory in South Africa using coal for running a small boiler for their production was affected due to the sudden "created" "shortage" and spiralling prices of coal.
As for the Chinese "investment". Ample proof exists that they "invest" with strings and sinister schemes attached. So those type of investments with added backhand deals fueling corruption are not in the best interest of our country.
Maybe you should remove the Chinese produce wool covering your eyes and mind. Just remember at the same time to remove your head from the sandpit first.