RIP Charlie Kirk

DJtal said:
Where were his guns when he needed them?
Click to expand...
One needs weapons now at university? Or at public open forums of debate?

You know very well there is a massive difference but alas, why not try and muddy the water right?
 
Pitbull said:
One needs weapons now at university? Or at public open forums of debate?

You know very well there is a massive difference but alas, why not try and muddy the water right?
Click to expand...
It's America my guy.....they need guns at primary schools.
 
Slckrck said:
Ag shame, is ok boet....ons almal het n af dag hoor, drink net daai blou pilletjie en jy sal oraait wees.
Click to expand...
Jy moet regtig harder probeer!

Jys so dom so grond, jy kan nie eers agter kom hoe mense jou uit haal nie. Hoekom, want… its all about me myself and I…

As jy jouself wil uit gee as n toffie, moet jy weet jy gaan gekou word.

Dalk jou skoolgeld gaan terug vra van watter skool jy glo gematrikuleer het… want jyt duidelik geen gesonde verstand nie!
 
It also helps Neo-cons, knowing the most respected leader of the American conservative youth (who was amenable to the nature of the USA-Israel relationship being anti-American) is now no longer a threat to their anti-American National Security Establishment goals.
 
lordnokon said:
Jy moet regtig harder probeer!

Jys so dom so grond, jy kan nie eers agter kom hoe mense jou uit haal nie. Hoekom, want… its all about me myself and I…

As jy jouself wil uit gee as n toffie, moet jy weet jy gaan gekou word.

Dalk jou skoolgeld gaan terug vra van watter skool jy glo gematrikuleer het… want jyt duidelik geen gesonde verstand nie!
Click to expand...
Boetie, daai Afrikaans is suspect 😁
 
The Voice said:
Charlie was one of the few to do open air events. And I think he’ll be the last. What happens now is anyone who isn’t drinking the Kool-Aid will feel like they have a massive target on their backs, and may hold back, or stop entirely: YouTubers, columnists, TikTokers, Twitter personalities, etc. That’s terrible for discourse but, of course, perfect if you’ve spent your entire political life in an echo chamber. You should be happy, because you’ll once again only hear your own thoughts regurgitated and reaffirmed. Your preference for violence instead of debate may finally get you what you want.

Congratulations, you became the Nazis you claimed to hate.
Click to expand...

Talk about a short-lived exhilaration on that one.
Any smart democrat/lefty/whatever would realise this is a massive blow to whatever ideology(ies) Kirk stood against.

The imagery of this young guy getting gunned down in such a visceral way is not something any normal person would want to have associated with their brand of politics.

Anyone who stood against him who thinks this was a win is k@k dom and the reality of that will come to sink in over time.
 
Slckrck said:
I wasn't bringing religion into this, the door was already open I just peaked in to ask a question..

And I quote:

"Don't compare Gaza and Muslims to the Christian belief system.
All non-Muslims are worse than pigs and deserve death according to their holy book"

Im still curious though..... anyway I guess I have my answer 😉
Click to expand...

Yeah, I am with Charlie on the Defend yourself if you are attacked.
It's called self-defence.

There is a good reason the crusades existed.
Anyway, I am going off topic, and this is meant for other threads.
So not commenting further on this.
 
RaptorSA said:
Talk about a short-lived exhilaration on that one.
Any smart democrat/lefty/whatever would realise this is a massive blow to whatever ideology(ies) Kirk stood against.

The imagery of this young guy getting gunned down in such a visceral way is not something anyone normal person would want to have associated with their brand of politics.

Anyone who stood against him who thinks this was a win is k@k dom and the reality of that will come to sink in over time.
Click to expand...

Just look online at all the woke, anti-west, pro-pally simps celebrating his murder... sadly, lots of k@k dom people out there...
 
rietrot said:
Not that great of a shot. His head probably the real target nobody aims for the neck.

Not super professional. But definitely a lot of planning went into the escape if you look at the other accomplices that got caught.
Click to expand...

Watched it a few times from a few different angles. Looks like the sniper went for centre mass, i.e. his chest because you can see an impact moving his shirt. His neck then opens up and blood sprays out. So I reckon it ricocheted off his body armour into his neck.
 
NarrowBandFtw said:
something being entirely drowned out by all the noise, including in this very thread:
- single shot from distance and height hitting the "mark" on the first try
- escape plan, evading capture

this was not a deranged loon, it was a professional

the real question should be: who ordered the hit and why?
Click to expand...
People with skills can be radicalized/indoctrinated to violence, so that's not off the table.
But until there is progress in the investigation, we won't know who was involved and the motivations.
 
The death of the moderate right would be a case of touche, for the Neocons.

The Left are merely their pawns.
 
The Voice said:
Watched it a few times from a few different angles. Looks like the sniper went for centre mass, i.e. his chest because you can see an impact moving his shirt. His neck then opens up and blood sprays out. So I reckon it ricocheted off his body armour into his neck.
Click to expand...
Crazy. I have not watched that closely.
Professional snipers (from police hostage videos like to do headshots.) Center mass is a handgun thing.

But I know nothing and am not a "sniper expert".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X