RIP Charlie Kirk

zll said:
So while this guy didn't deserve to die, he sounds like a bit of a chop.

Doesn't like gay people, thinks all trans people are mentally ill, and didn't think black people in the US deserved civil rights. Also has questionable views on vaccines, argued a lot of points based on the bible (oh boy), and went back and forth on whether the Epstein files should be released.

The only thing he seemed to make some sense on was guns, and that's only to some degree.
Click to expand...
Who gave you your opinion? Reddit?
 
Unhappy1 said:
Thread:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966496816112845019

For those without x

twitter-thread.com

NEWS: According to NBC, President Trump reports that a man is in custody in connection with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. by @benryanwriter(Benjamin Ryan) | Twitter Thread Reader

NEWS: According to NBC, President Trump reports that a man is in custody in connection with the assassination of Charlie Kirk. His name is Tyler Robinson—a Utah resident, born 2003. https://t.co/UpW1dMnxx7
twitter-thread.com twitter-thread.com
Click to expand...


Man, christmas is going to be wild at their house this year....
 
Alexander the Straight said:
Racial Identity and cultural preservation vs efficient economic prosperity.

That's what it's about at the heart of the right vs left saga.

The happy place is always going to lie in the middle.....

The problem now is that economic prosperity is becoming difficult, suddenly the left has little to offer for what the right sees as sacrifices they've had to make.

A new centre is being sought and will be found!!!
Click to expand...

What are you even talking about?!

Racial identity & cultural preservation vs economic prosperity is the right vs left saga... What?!

Racial identity & cultural preservation are not on the same side of the equation at all in the US.... And both at war against economic prosperity... What?

You make absolutely zero sense whatsover.
 
PsyWulf said:

UMD-Led Study Shows Disparities in Violence Among Extremist Groups | CCJS l Criminology and Criminal Justice Department l University of Maryland

First-of-its-kind Look at Left, Right, and Islamist Extremists Explores Similarities, Differences New research co-led by University of Maryland CCJS Professor Gary LaFree finds that some political extremist groups are more likely to commit violent acts than others—a belief that’s been...
ccjs.umd.edu ccjs.umd.edu
used this:


ccjls.scholasticahq.com

Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States | Published in Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society

By Celinet Duran. Using data from the U.S. Extremist Crime Database, this exploratory study examines the differences between far-left and far-right ideologically motivated fatal violence between 1990 and 2020.
ccjls.scholasticahq.com ccjls.scholasticahq.com
View attachment 1847434

Could keep going,the above one had an interesting few breakdowns between number of fatalities per political "attack" and other stats,like weapon of choice etc
Click to expand...

Again, a reference to your source, please.
 
OutlawJoseyWales said:
Can't use his own words to make a decent reply.

Relies on false meme to do so.
Click to expand...

That was about as much of a non-attacking reply as you deserved. The "easy" way out, would be to go and find examples that disprove your allegation. Of which there are so, so, soooooooooooooooooo so so so many. Just , so many, that easily disproves your attempt at an allegation. Because that inflammatory rhetoric is found on the extreme right, as well as the extreme left. Easily. Everywhere.

It was an attempt at giving you an easy out for a very silly generalized argument that is just a bit of a silly-billy. Like, eye-roll silly

But you shut it down.

Really, guy?
 
Mike Hoxbig said:
What point are you trying to make here? Because figure 2 is clear that there are far more victims of homicide on the right. So is the right killing the right over ideology? Figure 1 doesn't exactly state who the aggressor is in these "incidents"...
Click to expand...

The reason I keep asking for references. The reports are ambiguous, and the figures could be attributed to either side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X