RIP Charlie Kirk

lexity said:
Another text msg drops, sent the day before the murder of Charlie Kirk.


The desperation is palpable.
Click to expand...
The Israeli lobby groups in the US act like mobsters, you are either for or against us and if you "choose" the latter then we will come for you. Who knows how far down the rabbit hole it goes but Israel gets what Israel wants and Charlie was clearly not onboard with them any more in his last days.

I don't know whether that was ideological or just him opening his eyes to the ridiculous amount of control that Israel exerts over US leaders and the public at large, forcing people to toe the line when it comes to the Israel narrative or get cancelled and sending vast sums to finance Israel's wars while the US can barely look after it’s own people. Charlie's influence in the US was enormous, him changing his stance on Israel would have had very serious consequences for the Israel narrative and the Israel lobby has a history of attacking people that step out of line very aggressively. From the perspective of Israel Charlie was nipped in the bud just before he let the cat out of the bag, once he had publicly expressed his opinion on Israel it would have been too late.

I’m not into conspiracy theories but Israel has a history of covertly taking out foreign nationals using very creative means and as they say, the truth is stranger than fiction...
 
ForceFate said:
Nope. I don't know her state of mind at that point. I can't tell from the video how she feels.
Click to expand...
I mean it isn't that difficult to decipher considering she is talking. She tears up whenever she is talking about Charlie because she probably is remembering something about him.

When she isn't talking about him specifically, like discussing metrics or something like that, she brightens up.
 
konfab said:
I mean it isn't that difficult to decipher considering she is talking. She tears up whenever she is talking about Charlie because she probably is remembering something about him.

When she isn't talking about him specifically, like discussing metrics or something like that, she brightens up.
Click to expand...
Easy to intepret it differently but I'm not going to speculate based on few seconds of this video. I don't know how their family dynamics were like.
 
airborne said:
That's a weird thing to post, when people grieve they may be fine and laughing the one minute and then crying for 20mins half an hour later. I don't really know what to make of her but how people are dissecting her every move to try claim she isn't grieving appropriately is taking things too far.
Click to expand...
Funniest one is when people said she can't wear certain clothes because it's not "mourning clothes" haha. She has to wear mourning clothes forever. Or she can't hug friends. Or she's not crying 24/7 for the rest of her life.

It's bizarre.
 
Epstein files reveal the one day that the "color of the day" mentions are redacted...


p.s. warning Candace Owens clips speeded up!!
 
Jimmy Dore segment.... another one.

Extremely well-funded Military dots ....

(Why do we need to rely on comedian-podcasters to bring us the daily news? ... )

 
airborne said:
That's a weird thing to post, when people grieve they may be fine and laughing the one minute and then crying for 20mins half an hour later. I don't really know what to make of her but how people are dissecting her every move to try claim she isn't grieving appropriately is taking things too far.
Click to expand...
I tend to agree that mis-emotion/inappropriate emotions, showing, is nothing new in people who are grieving/mourning.

For some reason one tends to think there is not an impulse to detach from the pain of the moment. Perhaps those who are yet to experience a heavy loss of a loved one is where this kind of emotional straight-jacketing comes from.

On the other hand, in the case of this particular widow, there seems to me - and lot of other people - for reasons over and above the expected mourning behavior which raises a red flag.

Details are emerging all the time, just not from those officially appointed to conduct an investigation into the murder of Charlie Kirk.

This is the administration which has been caught lying about the Epstein files, and breaking the legal rules over transparency via the Epstein Transparency Act.

It is also the administration that is carrying water, for Israel in their preferred US foreign policy objectives. Which is not to say the Blue people would have acted any differently. My guess is they would have put up even LESS resistance than the current admin.

But, given the emerging picture of a militarized Charlie Kirk university speaking event, and Charlie Kirk's own text messages repudiating pressure tactics from Israeli donors when it comes to US foreign policy(the day before his murder, sent to Josh Hammer, who lied about claims Kirk was thinking of not co-operating with those donors before the text msg was made public).... this coverage is only going to continue to cause those intent on keeping the US public in the dark, more pain.

This is a very rare time in history in terms of pressure being put on the govt in terms of reasonable transparency.

My guess is that this goes all the way to the top families, who ofc are well-beyond the point of no return, and will probably use their significant resources to create the mother of all ****-storms, globally, including crashing the world's economies if need be, or orchestrating another mass panic event, the source of which doesn't require verification before shutting down the biggest life-support machine of them all(the economies of the world) - to distract from the scrutiny and attention that is being brought to bear upon them and their 'philanthropic' foundations.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X