'Rugby no place for blacks'

People with an attitude like Stofile is the reason there is no place for people like him. He is too aware of his blackness and thinks merely having an abundance of pigmentation grants him the right to have the highest ranking office.
Afrikaaners on the other hand love wining in Rugby so much, they would elect a black guy any day if he was the best choice.
/care about rugby though.
 
It is very sad the Stofile had to use race as a stab at the SA-Rugby administration, especially when one takes into account what a bad president he was.

But alas, it seems like this is the mentality, the race card will be played every time a black person with a chip on their shoulder doesn't get their way.
 
Yeah sour grapes... Pathetic... Democracy doesn't always result in a black winner, sometimes the best man for the job is the one appointed, deal with it...
 
Balstrome said:
But we must be careful not to say The race card is being played, if there is an actual problem in the process.
Click to expand...
Even if your point might be valid, why bring race into the equation? Why not sort the problem out?
 
lcbxx said:
Even if your point might be valid, why bring race into the equation? Why not sort the problem out?
Click to expand...

Because race is what this country is about today, white whining about being left out and blacks doing the same. if we, black and white, are not carefull, the coloureds are going to rule the show. And thats enought to smokkel your brain.
:D
 
Because they didn't vote for him, there is no space for blacks in SA Rugby? It couldn't be because he is a d***?
 
"Rugby people think I've done enough, and that's fair, so I'll go and do some other business."

Stofile's parting shot was the government should intervene in rugby. "I don't believe rugby should sort out their own problems."
Click to expand...

Hope the door hit him on the way out.
 
Soccer no place for whites?

since when is rugby a black culture thing anyways, are they jellouse, that rugby is doing better than soccer?

And besides, there is a reason why Afrikaners are better at rugby, http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=93504, http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=6&click_id=4&art_id=vn20071110082049669C635009

thanks to blacks fighting out half of the afrikaaner race in this country, the more athletic ones have survived, and are betting them in rugby, but yet they're jealous?
 
SuperMonkey said:
And besides, there is a reason why Afrikaners are better at rugby, http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php?t=93504, http://www.int.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=6&click_id=4&art_id=vn20071110082049669C635009

thanks to blacks fighting out half of the afrikaaner race in this country, the more athletic ones have survived, and are betting them in rugby, but yet they're jealous?
Click to expand...

Nick Mallett's dubious genetical speculations ( "the Afrikaner cultural group just seems to produce some freakishly built people with a freakish genetic make-up." ) aside, not ALL whites are Afrikaners, old boy!
:p
 
afrikaaners are mostly dutch right, well dutch people are the tallest 1.85m on average, that is taller than the average south african height of 1.69m,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height

you are caliming that everyone has equal ability to play rugby, when last did an chinese, or Japanese team win in rugby?
 
do they chose the players on an scientific method, height, history, # of tries, speed?
or besides this case is there any evidence of racism in rugby?
they should have a scientific method of choosing players, and this must be verified by the government, this should not have anything to do with colour.

If their are little or no blacks who fit the profile, then that be that.
 
Last edited:
SuperMonkey said:
do they chose the players on an scientific method, height, history, # of tries, speed?
or besides this case is there any evidence of racism in rugby?
they should have a scientific method of choosing players, and this must be verified by the government, this should not have anything to do with colour.

If their are little or no blacks who fit the profile, then that be that.
Click to expand...

Dont be silly, scientific method!!!!

All players are monitored scientifically to some degree or another.
What sets the criteria for team selection is however the coach and what he/she believes he/she requires of a specific individual in a specific position.
Do you want tall jumpers,fast loose forwards or enforcers as a mere example.

Stofile came to the defence of De Villiers during the dispute over final say in team selection in the SARU constitution and his skin colour.
Now it seems that De Villiers is no longer black enough, nor is Hoskins (both being coloured) now that Hoskins has beaten him in the polls.
All of a sudden there is no place for blacks in SA rugby, according to one of the infamous Stofile brothers all of a sudden.
He is a frikkin racist, no doubt whatsoever. He provides the proof himself the idiot.

edit:
As for Mallet, I find it hard to believe that his comment is false or even misguided. Afrikaners breed fantastic rugby players, it is known the world over and has nothing to do with racism. Heart and commitment and never say die attitude. Freekish even as Mallet put it.
No different from the way the Islanders produce fantastic athletes for almost every code of rugby which noone denies.
 
Last edited:
Shame Stofile doesn't get elected so he goes back to what he knows best. Pulling the race card. That story's getting old and we don't care anymore old chap!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X