rza!!! Dude!!! It's LEVIATHAN!!!

I just don't understand how anyone can think the world is 6000 years old. Why be so close minded?
 
mass09 said:
I just don't understand how anyone can think the world is 6000 years old. Why be so close minded?
Click to expand...

It's not called being close minded, its called having faith in the only book that has recorded the history of men from their beginning.
 
rza said:
It's not called being close minded, its called having faith in the only book that has recorded the history of men from their beginning.
Click to expand...

and where is the history of women recorded?


/apologies to everyone, I just can't take these "discussions" seriously...
 
rza has finally made me understand where the term "blind faith" comes from.

The absolute idiocy in believing that the planet is 6000 years old boggles my mind. I have never ever been confronted with such absolute ignorance and spitefulness regarding Modern Science.

Rza. Seriously....you are embarassing human kind.
 
rza said:
Are you aware that for every evolutionistic discovery, there's a refutation?
Click to expand...

Well there are millions of discoveries about evolution rza... millions. ROFLOL. Tens of millions of fossils.
 
luxe said:
rza has finally made me understand where the term "blind faith" comes from.

The absolute idiocy in believing that the planet is 6000 years old boggles my mind. I have never ever been confronted with such absolute ignorance and spitefulness regarding Modern Science.

Rza. Seriously....you are embarassing human kind.
Click to expand...

We always need to refer to evolution by using the word evolution and not science. I am ignorant and spiteful when it comes to evolution, and that is not going to change. Science is factual, and I have no problem with it.
 
w1z4rd said:
Well there are millions of discoveries about evolution rza... millions. ROFLOL. Tens of millions of fossils.
Click to expand...

Let me correct you. There are millions of fossils, and all of them have nothing to do with evolution. Evolution has never produced even one fossil as evidence.
 
rza said:
We always need to refer to evolution by using the word evolution and not science. I am ignorant and spiteful when it comes to evolution, and that is not going to change. Science is factual, and I have no problem with it.
Click to expand...

You don't say.
 
rza, you realise that it isn't through evolution theories that the age of the earth is determined right?

By your own admission, you're ok with geology and physics. What do those fields have to say about the age of the earth?
 
mo_mia said:
rza, you realise that it isn't through evolution theories that the age of the earth is determined right?

By your own admission, you're ok with geology and physics. What do those fields have to say about the age of the earth?
Click to expand...

Evolutionistic geologists say it's billions of years old. Geologists say it's only thousands of years old.
 
rza said:
Not interested in conversations about dating methods, so let's not go there. Evolutionists says this 'leviathan' is 12 million years ago, I say no animals existed beyond 6000 years ago, so we are always going to disagree. I'm not up to the copying and pasting that will follow if we engage in this conversation.
Click to expand...

Not interested in being proven wrong yet again? Sounds about right.

rza said:
We always need to refer to evolution by using the word evolution and not science. I am ignorant and spiteful when it comes to evolution, and that is not going to change. Science is factual, and I have no problem with it.
Click to expand...

You're ignorant and spiteful, full stop. And why do you think it's called "evolutionary science", you dumb ****?

If there was a theory of de-evolution, rza would be its knuckle-dragging poster boy.
 
rza said:
Evolutionistic geologists say it's billions of years old. Geologists say it's only thousands of years old.
Click to expand...

You mean 'literal biblical geologist apologists' say it's only thousands of years old.

'Geologist Apologist', sounds like a band. :p
 
rza said:
Let's agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

Nope. If only it were so easy eh?

*edit*

Are you seriously saying to me that you will be able to produce a geologist who does not have a literal interpretation to prove, who believes that the earth is a couple thousand years old?

I will eat my hat rza. I will also eat my socks (worn).
 
rza said:
Let's agree to disagree.
Click to expand...

No lets agree that you at one point thought the Earth's crust was millions of kilometres thick. I take your opinions on geology with not just a pinch but an entire bag of salt.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X