SA needs more IT graduates

I brought race into it, yes, however it was not a racist comment, the reality is that there has been mention that not enough black representation in ICT in SA, that is a reality. If they are acknowledging it, this would imply they intend to do something abt it, I was merely making a statement of supply and demand and that right now there is no competing on the basis of skin colour. I hope for your sake that you were not taking it out of context!!!

Black, white , couloured, can the person do the job? That is the most important question. I didn't call you racist so don't get your panties in a knot. The simple fact is that experiance, skill and aptitude are what drive those positions. It's not something that can be simply learned either. I'm a firm beleiver that it is the manner in which you think, if you have it, regardless of education you should manage in the field and excel, if you don't, you may parrot the right things but will nevr be able to practicly solve real world problems.
 
SA has pitiful few IT skills and there are no new trainee’s coming through. Because of the crappy broadband, the high costs associated with telecommunications, the monopolistic practises of providers and, of course, the ever present gravy trough, there are too few and none are being trained (cost and dumbed-down education). Telkom, hang your head! The power paradigm has shifted from manpower and bludgeons to knowledge and viruses. We need proficient people to man the electronic frontier to the country. Not to invent “Made in SA” innovations (I wish) but just to hold the line. We are becoming vulnerable to electronic attack. The nature of warfare is changing and futile efforts (like the Arms Deal) are way behind the curve. Another stuff-up.

M&G 4/1/2010
Cyber-warfare 'a growing threat'

Cyber-warfare attacks on military infrastructure, government and communications systems, and financial markets pose a rapidly growing but little understood threat to international security and could become a decisive weapon of choice in future conflicts between states, the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies (ISS) warned this week.

IISS director general John Chipman said: "Despite evidence of cyber-attacks in recent political conflicts, there is little appreciation internationally of how to assess cyber-conflict. We are now, in relation to the problem of cyber-warfare, at the same stage of intellectual development as we were in the 1950s in relation to possible nuclear war."

The warning accompanied Tuesday's publication of the Military Balance 2010, the IISS's annual assessment of global military capabilities and defence economics. The study also highlighted a series of other security threats, including the war in Afghanistan, China's military diversification, the progress of Iran's suspect nuclear programme, and the impact of terrorist groups in Iraq and elsewhere.

Future state-on-state conflict, as well as conflicts involving non-state actors such as al-Qaeda, would increasingly be characterised by reliance on asymmetric warfare techniques, chiefly cyber-warfare, Chipman said. Hostile governments could hide behind rapidly advancing technology to launch attacks undetected. And unlike conventional and nuclear arms, there were no agreed international controls on the use of cyber-weapons.

"Cyber-warfare [may be used] to disable a country's infrastructure, meddle with the integrity of another country's internal military data, try to confuse its financial transactions or to accomplish any number of other possibly crippling aims," he said. Yet governments and national defence establishments at present have only limited ability to tell when they were under attack, by whom, and how they might respond.

Cyber-warfare typically involves the use of illegal exploitation methods on the internet, corruption or disruption of computer networks and software, hacking, computer forensics, and espionage. Reports of cyber-warfare attacks, government-sponsored or otherwise, are rising. Last month Google launched an investigation into cyber-attacks allegedly originating in China that it said had targeted the email accounts of human rights activists.

In December the South Korean government reported an attack in which it said North Korean hackers may have stolen secret defence plans outlining the South Korean and United States strategy in the event of war on the Korean peninsula. Last July, espionage protection agents in Germany said the country faced "extremely sophisticated" Chinese and Russian internet spying operations targeting industrial secrets and critical infrastructure such as Germany's power grid.

One of the most notorious cyber-warfare offensives to date took place in Estonia in 2007 when more than one million computers were used to jam government, business and media websites. The attacks, widely believed to have originated in Russia, coincided with a period of heightened bilateral political tension. They inflicted damage estimated in the tens of millions of euros of damage.

China last week accused the Obama administration of waging "online warfare" against Iran by recruiting a "hacker brigade" and manipulating social media such as Twitter and YouTube to stir up anti-government agitation.

The US Defence Department's Quadrennial Defence Review, published this week, also highlighted the rising threat posed by cyber-warfare on space-based surveillance and communications systems. "On any given day, there are as many as seven million DoD [Department of Defence] computers and telecommunications tools in use in 88 countries using thousands of war-fighting and support applications. The number of potential vulnerabilities, therefore, is staggering." the review said.

"Moreover, the speed of cyber-attacks and the anonymity of cyberspace greatly favour the offence. This advantage is growing as hacker tools become cheaper and easier to employ by adversaries whose skills are growing in sophistication."

Defensive measures have already begun. Last June the Pentagon created US Cyber Command and Britain announced it was opening a cyber-security operations centre attached to GCHQ at Cheltenham, in coordination with MI5 and MI6.

William Lynn, US Deputy Defence Secretary, described the cyber-challenge as unprecedented. "Once the province of nations, the ability to destroy via cyber now also rests in the hands of small groups and individuals: from terrorist groups to organised crime, hackers to industrial spies to foreign intelligence services … This is not some future threat. The cyber threat is here today, it is here now," Lynn said. -- guardian.co.uk © Guardian News and Media 2010

It’s hard to be humble.
 
I have completed my studies,I would be graduating on 5th of MAY with an IT degree.I am struggling to find a job yet it is being said that there is a shortage of IT graduate. can some one come to my rescue

That's the problem in SA at the moment, my advice is this.. get a job, any job. smaller the pay check the lesser the commitment but work you're butt off. preferably in something more technical than web thingies. So some back end dev in c/c++/4gl etc

Update your resume/cv and you will find 6months to a yr later everyone will be head hunting you.. and you will keep wonding where they were x months ago when no one wanted anything to do with you even though you haven't really done much in the more grander scheme of things. Its weird but such is life.

Join a graduate programme from one of the big corporates. Granted, it is very difficult to get in (you really have to be one of the top students in your class, if you are white that is), but it is very rewarding.

BS! its hard to get irrespective on colour, that perception is just wrong, get over yourself. For big companies/coporates or even emerging ones and every single rec company they will look at two things, results and exp. Since graduates lack the latter they look at the former, results and place where possible based on that. That's not to say there will be quota's on numbers etc.

The problem is experiance. Uni/Tech doesn't teach near real world and you can expect a sharp learning curve when you enter. Not many places can afford to hire and maintain juniors while you learn the ropes.

What i've found is this. Work = no different than university if you actually did the work and not just relied on friends for it. In fact i'm finding work to be easier by a long shot. Documentation is a sucky process but that's something that i guess one has to get use to. Other than that have a learnt something that i couldn't have done on my own? no, not yet and have my doubts.. but ok, getting paid to learn things is kewl.

An IT graduate won't solve any problems. Take it from me, as a student at a university that they only teach the basics. Experience is what counts, what happens after university is what is important

Depends on the student/person. Some are involved in working, others are just working for that exam and you gt the balanced ones that do both well. The 1st do well at work because that's what they do but start off worse off salary wise, the exam guys do well salary wise but are hr nightmares when their performance is not as good, and the other balanced types are just over all good.

Overall hr policies are flawed in IT. That needs to be addressed but never is.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X