SA proposes rules for fracking shale gas

yebocan

Honorary Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2005
Messages
15,371
Reaction score
6,363
Location
Now North..behind the BW Curtain...
Johannesburg - South Africa's cabinet on Thursday proposed new regulations to govern exploration for shale gas, an important step in opening up an industry that could provide new energy supplies for Africa's largest economy.

South Africa last year lifted a moratorium on shale gas exploration in its Karoo region, where fracking might tap what is believed to be some of the world's biggest reserves of the energy source.

The sparsely populated Karoo is renowned for its rugged scenery and is home to species such as the mountain zebra and riverine rabbit, one of the rarest mammals in the world.

The government signaled on Thursday it was keen to start exploiting the resource.

“Not only does the potential of shale gas exploration and exploitation provide an opportunity for us to begin production of our own fuel, but it also marks the beginning of the reindustrialization of the South African economy,” Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu said in a statement.

“By embarking on this process presented by hydraulic fracturing for the production of shale gas, we bring the country a step closer to the achievement of our objectives,” she said.

Companies showing an interest in exploring South Africa's shale gas potential include Royal Dutch Shell.

Shabangu said the proposed technical regulations provided for the protection of water resources, an issue that has raised concern among conservationists as the Karoo is semi-arid.

Environmentalists also say water supplies could be polluted by fracking, in which pressurised water, chemicals and sand are pumped underground to release gas trapped in shale formations.

The proposed regulations include measures to protect wildlife in the region as well as its rich fossil deposits.

The prospect of energy exploration in the Karoo has raised alarm bells in South Africa, which has a large network of conservation groups and a history of green activism.

But South Africa also wants to reduce its heavy dependence on coal usage, which emits greenhouse gases linked to climate change. Close to 90 percent of the country's power supply comes from coal-fuelled plants.

Developing just a 10th of South Africa's estimated resources could boost the economy by 200 billion rand ($19.56 billion) a year and create 700,000 jobs, a study, commissioned by Shell and carried out by research firm Econometrix, said last year.

The proposed regulations have been published in South Africa's government gazette and the public has 30 days in which to comment on them. - Reuters




http://www.iol.co.za/business/compa...for-fracking-shale-gas-1.1590257#.UlawD1Bmwuo
 
fists.jpg
.
 
Bring it on. My support for fracking is well documented on this forum...
 
"Developing just a 10th of South Africa's estimated resources could boost the economy by 200 billion rand ($19.56 billion) a year and create 700,000 jobs, a study, commissioned by Shell and carried out by research firm Econometrix, said last year."

Just think this could pay for all the Etolling and be enough for the ANC to steal. :D
 
Just go read the results from fracking done in the US. It might be good for the country but we are going to be stuffed when we have no usable water left.... personally I'm totally against it
 
Aha, I see the fracktivist myths have started already.

Water usage: from Popular Mechanics (referenced) - Of the 9.5 billion gallons of water used daily in Pennsylvania, natural gas development consumes 1.9 million gallons a day (mgd); livestock use 62 mgd; mining, 96 mgd; and industry, 770 mgd.

Contamination: But the idea stressed by fracking critics that deep-injected fluids will migrate into groundwater is mostly false. Basic geology prevents such contamination from starting below ground. A fracture caused by the drilling process would have to extend through the several thousand feet of rock that separate deep shale gas deposits from freshwater aquifers. According to geologist Gary Lash of the State University of New York at Fredonia, the intervening layers of rock have distinct mechanical properties that would prevent the fissures from expanding a mile or more toward the surface. It would be like stacking a dozen bricks on top of each other, he says, and expecting a crack in the bottom brick to extend all the way to the top one. What's more, the fracking fluid itself, thickened with additives, is too dense to ascend upward through such a channel

The only contamination ever recorded is from spills. So, accidents, where safety and security were not followed or pipes burst. This is no different to any other industry.

Evidence: there have been more than a million wells fracked since 1947 in the US alone. Meta-studies on this abundance of data shows fracking to be safer than even shallow mining.

But it makes water flammable - it must be dangerous? : wrong. In the crap documentaries showing this that have now been fully debunked, the water springs being lit on fire are those that have been that way for hundreds of years. There's record of some of them being lit on fire since the 1600s. And Josh Fox is a debunked liar.

But houses exploded? : yes, and in Gasland they make out as if it was fracking that caused this, when in fact it had nothing to do with fracking. The wells responsible were natural gas wells (completely different to fracking). They had absolutely nothing to do with fracking.

The fury over fracking really started with Gasland. That so-called documentary has been proven to be a work of carefully constructed fiction. It is bullschit...
 
Just go read the results from fracking done in the US. It might be good for the country but we are going to be stuffed when we have no usable water left.... personally I'm totally against it

And coal. Abandon that too.
 
Just do yourself a favour and go Google fracking in the US and see the latest results from fracking.
 
I have. For a long time now. Search the forum for mine and jstrikes defence of fracking. Simply telling someone to google something is not nearly as illuminating as you clearly think it is. There are a ton of myths relating to fracking. A lot if science on the other hand. The science shows it to be perfectly safe on condition that it is implemented correctly. As with any other industry...
 
....on condition that it is implemented correctly. As with any other industry...

And that is where the problem lies. Have you seen the number of fracking accidents? Let me get some info together.

I do not want to get into a p****ing match, its almost akin to discussing e-tolls.

But just as you say about science and diss the other stuff so I feel about dissing the other stuff. Is it not the very same science who is now backtracking on global warming... Science is just as full of speculation and the real world situation and scientifically tested are sometimes world apart.
 
on condition that it is implemented correctly.

The same argument has been mooted re the death penalty and even die hard pro-death supporters say not a chance under this govt.

If you trust this gang of thieves and fools to protect the Karoo then I have a bridge to sell you.
 
Oh god, it's private industry taking the reigns. They're not incentivised to fsck up...
 
After doing 3 years of Chemical Engineering, I can say with absolute confidence that fracking is by far one of the best things that can happen for us. SA has the highest CO2 emission per capita IN THE WORLD, thanks to our almost complete reliance on coal. I can't even begin to express how much cleaner burning gas is than coal. Burnt coal releases all sorts of nasties like NOx, SOx, and phosphate gases, which are almost impossible to clean and literally around 20 000 times worse per kilogram than a kilo of CO2. Normal coal is around 2% the nasty stuff... you do the math. Burning gas is infinitesimally better.

Another thing is we're working on instantaneous galvanic hydrocarbon fuel cells to pop in your home and electric car. This means you will now generate electricity on site at your house for an equivalent 50c/kWh at current gas prices (which will drop when our market is flooded with the gas from the Karoo). That and you'll have an electric car that you feed gas - it doesn't burn it, it reacts electrolytically, meaning normal engines that are currently about 11% efficient at converting fuel to motion, the new cells will be between 40-55% efficient and getting motion out (depending on the electric motor designs).

Fracking is the best possible thing that can happen now.
 
Bring it on. My support for fracking is well documented on this forum...

+1
Also been following the international debate for a long time.
The positives outweigh the negatives by far - especially for a country like SA.
 
'cos scientists are never wrong.

Cool. Let's stop everything then. Science might be wrong.

You can't base a decision on the possibility that it might be wrong. That's rather faulty logic. Nothing points to there being significant risk, particularly to an area as desolate as the Karoo, based on what we know about fracking, which by the way has been taking place since 1947. A significant amount of scientific data exists for it. They're not just sucking their results out of thin air...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X