SA Ship register 'uncompetitive'

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,431
Reaction score
9,945
Location
District 9
South Africa's ship register is seen as "uncompetitive", a perception that has resulted in not a single merchant vessel being listed, according to the SA Maritime Safety Authority (Samsa).

This has left the country -- which relies each year on about 12,000 foreign vessels to carry 96 percent of its exports to the rest of the world -- strategically vulnerable, it says in its 2012/13 annual report.

"This... means that South Africa's economy and its security of trade are dependent on ships owned and regulated in foreign countries."

Ship ownership was of strategic importance to any maritime state, "hence the rush by many... to attract merchant ships to register on their national ship registers".

However, while South Africa had one of the oldest ship registers in the world, it did not have a single merchant ship listed on it.

"That is not because there is no South African company that owns such ships, but those shipping companies have opted to flag their ships in foreign jurisdictions due to the fact that the SA Ship Register is considered uncompetitive."

The reports says shipping "has become a global activity", with ship owners free to flag their vessels in states different to their own.

"Today, shipping owners decide where to locate their ships on the strength and attractiveness of national ship registers, a business decision influenced by factors such as the attractiveness of a ship registry's taxation and broader legal regime."

The report, tabled in Parliament, says the lack of an own-flagged merchant fleet has cost South Africa dearly.

"The ability of South Africa to carry its own import and export trade has been in catastrophic decline since the early 1990s.

"This has inopportunely occurred during one of the fastest growth periods in international trade volumes experienced by South Africa."

It had led to "a significant loss of critical public and private sector maritime expertise; a commercial maritime services competence; industrial capacity; the capacity to undertake marine research; [and], development and innovation that a country accrues from owning and operating an indigenous merchant shipping industry".

The report further notes that if its vast territorial water and economic exclusion zone was taken into account, South Africa was the "largest" country in Africa.

"It has the immense and untapped potential of becoming a major maritime nation."

The report says a "more friendly" ship register is only one part of a package of legislative changes, regulations and concessions needed to make "flagging in South Africa attractive to ship owners and charterers of bareboats".

Further, that the prospects for successfully introducing all the measures in such a package "depend upon government policy".

Samsa is a statutory body tasked with promoting South Africa's maritime interests while ensuring maritime safety, health and environmental protection. It administers the SA Ship Register.


Source : Sapa /rod/tk/rf/jje
Date : 01 Oct 2013 14:28
 
I have to agree with this, in 6 years of importing I have never yet had a single container that has arrived in South Africa on a South African Ship.
And yet we have such great access to the sea and trade routes?
 
Oh fsck, next we gonna have a nationalised merchant marine fleet ala SAA...
 
Oh fsck, next we gonna have a nationalised merchant marine fleet ala SAA...

I hope not... but it does obviously highlight that there is room for some private entrepreneurs to jump in here.

Now if only I had massive amounts of capital! ;)
 
Why is this a big thing?

I'm pretty sure quite a few countries have no merchant ships on their register.... this would not be unique to us.
 
Why is this a big thing?

I'm pretty sure quite a few countries have no merchant ships on their register.... this would not be unique to us.

It's just pointing to a massive gap in our industrial development.
We have 2500 kms of coastline.
We already have two major ports and could develop a few others.
We are sitting on a major east west trade route.
We could become the real "gateway to Africa" in terms of trade and transport.
And yet we are just sitting here twiddling our thumbs.
 
We have at least four largeish ports. The two largest been Durban and Slaapstad, the other two being Port Elizabeth and East London.

Unfortunately we do not sit on such a "east to west" route as we used to. The Suez Canal killed a lot of traffic around our coast a long time ago.
 
Not quite, not in the slightest.

All it points to is that we don't have ships on OUR register.

We have 3 Major Ports... all 3 of which are being expanded quite a lot.
We have at least 1 more port that is vying for status of being a Major port. (Ngqura)
We have at least 2 more ports that are quite busy, but not necessarily major (PE and EL) (mostly used for vehicle exports as far as I understand it)
We are already the gateway to Africa in terms of trade and transport, having ships on our register will not make a difference to that, but what will make a difference is us beefing up our rail network, which is currently happening with the development of transport hubs in CPT, JHB, PTA, DBN....
 
We have at least four largeish ports. The two largest been Durban and Slaapstad, the other two being Port Elizabeth and East London.

Unfortunately we do not sit on such a "east to west" route as we used to. The Suez Canal killed a lot of traffic around our coast a long time ago.

You would be surprised on that front... The Suez Canal is a place that quite a few ship owners avoid, due to the dangers of getting through the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea.. piracy is massively rampant up there, to the point that most ships that do transit the Suez are carrying quite heavily armed security teams these days.
 
Not quite, not in the slightest.

All it points to is that we don't have ships on OUR register.

We have 3 Major Ports... all 3 of which are being expanded quite a lot.
We have at least 1 more port that is vying for status of being a Major port. (Ngqura)
We have at least 2 more ports that are quite busy, but not necessarily major (PE and EL) (mostly used for vehicle exports as far as I understand it)
We are already the gateway to Africa in terms of trade and transport, having ships on our register will not make a difference to that, but what will make a difference is us beefing up our rail network, which is currently happening with the development of transport hubs in CPT, JHB, PTA, DBN....

What are your top 3? Cause afaik, Durban, Cape Town, PE and EL are the largest ones.

EL is used to export Mercs and much of our meat.

Richards Bay and Saldanha Bay are smaller than PE and EL AFAIK.
 
Last edited:
What are your top 3? Cause afaik, Durban, Cape Town, PE and EL are the largest ones.

EL is used to export Mercs and much of our meat.

Purely on a volume basis, I would say Durban, Richards Bay, CPT... then EL and PE...

Ngqura is still tiny in terms of volume, but they want to be a large break-bulk port.
 
Purely on a volume basis, I would say Durban, Richards Bay, CPT... then EL and PE...

Ngqura is still tiny in terms of volume, but they want to be a large break-bulk port.

I dont know if I accept that. I would put Richards Bay pretty much last. Do you have stats for this?
 
Not in the slightest....

Our Port operations are what help in our marketing, our transport network etc...

I disagree. The register could be used to market as well... and it should be being used for that.
But it's not because it is notoriously incomplete.
 
I dont know if I accept that. I would put Richards Bay pretty much last.

Richards bay blows most ports out of the water on pure tonnage, hell it even gives Durban a run for its money...
 
How much is a container ship? 200 mill US dollars or so? Maybe they not registering here because the owners don't want to have to take on bee "partners".

Just a thought.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X