SA ups competitiveness

Djtay

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2009
Messages
462
Reaction score
0
http://www.fin24.com/Economy/SA-ups-competitiveness-despite-labour-ills-20100519

Johannesburg - South Africa has seen its economic competitiveness rise for the second year running, but labour issues are still perceived as an obstacle.

According to a survey from the World Competitiveness Yearbook, published by the Swiss-based Institute of Management Development (IMD), South Africa has increased its ranking to 44th this year, following its 2009 and 2008 rankings of 53rd and 48th respectively.

The survey highlights that South Africa, like other emerging markets, benefited from inflows of foreign capital.

“South Africa's strong competitiveness is being linked to the increased level of portfolio investment assets and direct investment stocks moving inward, as investors divert to emerging markets that were not too exposed to the financial crisis in a bid to protect their assets," said executive manager of Productivity SA Sello Mosai.

Rock bottom in joblessness

Areas where South Africa scored particularly badly were unemployment (58th out of 58 countries surveyed), unemployment of youth under 25 (55th), equal opportunity legislation (57th), personal security and protection of private property (54th) and the availability of skilled labour (58th).

However, a look at the countries selected for the report shows that South Africa is the only African country represented. Notable exclusions from the survey would include high growth international regions such as Iran, Nigeria, Vietnam, Egypt and Pakistan, all of which have been tipped by investment analysts as high growth regions.

Business accelerator Aurik’s Pavlo Phitidis said the concentration of many major industries in the hands of a couple of dominant players contributes to South Africa's lack of competitiveness.

He points to an international report on South Africa, which showed that just 11% of the economic supply chain was in the hands of small- to medium-sized enterprises.

"These large organisations have through self-regulation created layers and layers of red tape for new entrants, which in turn raises the cost for entrepreneurs," Phitidis said.

For example, a number of the small firms he mentors and supports have run foul of regulations which fail to promote their development or growth, or improve their competitiveness.

Phitidis added that for him, the South African labour market went hand in hand with the education system and cut to the core of a major problem facing the country.

On the plus side, South Africa scored highly in the areas of cost-of-living index (1st place), effective personal income tax rate (2nd), stock market capitalisation as a percentage of gross domestic product (2nd) and electricity costs for industrial clients (1st).
 
ROFL at Therooster (aka Kill-A-Whitey) troll's premature ejaculation.

http://www.fin24.com/Economy/SA-ups-competitiveness-despite-labour-ills-20100519

Johannesburg - South Africa has seen its economic competitiveness rise for the second year running, but labour issues are still perceived as an obstacle.

According to a survey from the World Competitiveness Yearbook, published by the Swiss-based Institute of Management Development (IMD), South Africa has increased its ranking to 44th this year, following its 2009 and 2008 rankings of 53rd and 48th respectively.

The survey highlights that South Africa, like other emerging markets, benefited from inflows of foreign capital.

“South Africa's strong competitiveness is being linked to the increased level of portfolio investment assets and direct investment stocks moving inward, as investors divert to emerging markets that were not too exposed to the financial crisis in a bid to protect their assets," said executive manager of Productivity SA Sello Mosai.
Rock bottom in joblessness
Is this why he creamed his jeans?
Areas where South Africa scored particularly badly were unemployment (58th out of 58 countries surveyed), unemployment of youth under 25 (55th), equal opportunity legislation (57th), personal security and protection of private property (54th) and the availability of skilled labour (58th).
Loads to be proud of there - the shining success of BEE/AA !
However, a look at the countries selected for the report shows that South Africa is the only African country represented. Notable exclusions from the survey would include high growth international regions such as Iran, Nigeria, Vietnam, Egypt and Pakistan, all of which have been tipped by investment analysts as high growth regions.
High growth ? - growing poppies maybe?
Business accelerator Aurik’s Pavlo Phitidis said the concentration of many major industries in the hands of a couple of dominant players contributes to South Africa's lack of competitiveness.
That's right, in the hands of the corrupt ANC scumbags and their cronies.
He points to an international report on South Africa, which showed that just 11% of the economic supply chain was in the hands of small- to medium-sized enterprises.

"These large organisations have through self-regulation created layers and layers of red tape for new entrants, which in turn raises the cost for entrepreneurs," Phitidis said.

For example, a number of the small firms he mentors and supports have run foul of regulations which fail to promote their development or growth, or improve their competitiveness.

Phitidis added that for him, the South African labour market went hand in hand with the education system and cut to the core of a major problem facing the country.
Lets dumb down the education system a little more, then we'll have loads more graduates.
On the plus side, South Africa scored highly in the areas of cost-of-living index (1st place), effective personal income tax rate (2nd), stock market capitalisation as a percentage of gross domestic product (2nd) and electricity costs for industrial clients (1st).

Can you see the reason for the trolls premature ejaculation?

Zooma said it.
 
Last edited:
after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)
 
after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)

Welcome to MyKKK;)
 
after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)

Or uneducated... blind... dumb... and the list goes on.
 
after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)

He didn't earn the title based on his post in this thread. But don't let that stop you from indulging yourself with unsupported generalisations.

:)
 
Welcome to MyKKK;)

The speed with which you resort to maligning the name of this forum with that odious involuntary association reveals your true agenda ;).
Same goes for the rest of the anklebiting chorus.
 
The speed with which you resort to maligning the name of this forum with that odious involuntary association reveals your true agenda ;).
Same goes for the rest of the anklebiting chorus.

that's exactly what i mean, and you've just proved it again. anyone you (or anyone else) disagrees with has an "agenda"

who says its not you who has the agenda? who decides which side of the argument is an agenda and which side is the biblical truth? and i ask this in all honesty....
 
that's exactly what i mean, and you've just proved it again. anyone you (or anyone else) disagrees with has an "agenda"

who says its not you who has the agenda? who decides which side of the argument is an agenda and which side is the biblical truth? and i ask this in all honesty....

My initial reply was not to the OP, so I'm not sure what my apparent agenda would be. My second reply was in reaction to the OP falling back by insulting everyone on the forum by association. Your conclusion from this is to question my motives but not his remark?
 
after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)

I am 100% sure if anyone in the forum associated blacks = "uneducated masses" or "savages" that person would be banned for next few minutes.

People posted "uneducated masses" and "savages" it did not mean they are referring to "black". You think so because you already associated they are the same but you should not put what you think to the people's mouth. IT IS NOT FAIR.
 
lol. Pwned.

yes you were....

:confused: Who got pwned? The unemployed?

unfortunately

after a few weeks of reading the current affairs forum, i've finally figured out how it works.

lots of people post lots of things about how the sky is going to fall on our heads, and that's all kewl. thrown in something racist and call Black south africans "uneducated masses" or "savages" and that also seems to be kewl. blatant lies and half-truths to prove their points seem to be kewl as well...

anyone who posts anything positive about the country or tries to argue against any of the above is called a troll.

:)

speaking of half-truisms, the OP posted this 'wonderful' thing about SA, but did he accidental forget to include
Areas where South Africa scored particularly badly were unemployment (58th out of 58 countries surveyed), unemployment of youth under 25 (55th), equal opportunity legislation (57th), personal security and protection of private property (54th) and the availability of skilled labour (58th).

or is that just distracting from the positive here? it's all fine and well to post positive things, but how can you conveniently leave out this part????

Welcome to MyKKK;)

if you think this forum is so bad, why don't you go and create your own? call it MyANC/MyZuma/MyGravyTrain ....
 
speaking of half-truisms, the OP posted this 'wonderful' thing about SA, but did he accidental forget to include

No he didn't, 6th paragraph down. Are you whining because he didn't put it in bold?
 
Well it makes a refreshing change from the +1 brigade.

Tarring everyone who isn't singing from the same hymn sheet with that "MyKKK" brush is actually pretty old, stale and just plain insulting.

I get what you're saying about the +1 replies to posts that start with bad news. The other "brigade" is just as irritatingly predictable though. IMO S.A. is like a football team going through a slump. We need some solid wins to counter the negativity. Only concrete results will do it, not presidential pep-talks and the odd positive news article. I find the informative posts from capetownguy worth reading. It would be useful to have more input like that to address the mentality that you're referring to than the lame insults from the chorus that just further entrench people's opinions. (No accusations aimed at you there.)
 
Tarring everyone who isn't singing from the same hymn sheet with that "MyKKK" brush is actually pretty old, stale and just plain insulting.

just like tarring everyone who doesn't sing from your hymnsheet as being "ANC apologists" etc.... goes both ways.
(not you sepcifically, but is happens often enuff)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X