SAA may abandon local flights

Ockie

Resident Lead Bender
Joined
Feb 16, 2008
Messages
55,097
Reaction score
7,323
Location
Henceforth AKA OckieMoto :-)
normal_1610.jpg


SAA has hinted that it may drop all local and short-haul, “full-service” flights, making way for its low-cost carrier, Mango, to fill the gap.

Nico Bezuidenhout, the acting SAA CEO, dropped the bombshell this week during an extensive presentation to the media.

Bezuidenhout said SAA’s average break-even fare for domestic and short-haul flights was R1 700, while Mango’s was below R900. It was a “no-brainer” what a consumer would choose, he said.

In the past financial year, SAA made R790-million in operating profit for domestic routes, against R760-million for regional flights.

However, 60% of capacity was being dedicated to domestic flights and just 30% to regional. “It is clear there are higher margins for the African operations,” he said.

Optimising the network is a fundamental part of Bezuidenhout’s 90-day action plan and SAA’s long-term turnaround strategy. In January, Bezuidenhout noted that SAA’s domestic routes were loss-making, while the regional routes were profitable.

The trend worldwide has been for the bigger airlines to hand over short routes to their low-cost subsidiaries — or exit the market. He said a study done in 2005 in North America showed that once low-cost carriers had entered the market, “the bigger airlines have 70% of fare levels they had 10 years [before]”.

Bezuidenhout is desperately trying to breathe life into the flailing national carrier, which is battling a crippling financial overhang.

He took over last October from CEO Monwabisi Kalawe, who was mysteriously suspended, resulting in a power struggle between Public Enterprises Minister Lynne Brown and SAA chairwoman Dudu Miyeni. Brown insisted on Kalawe’s reinstatement, and Miyeni refused.

Kalawe is now being investigated by Edward Nathan Sonnenberg. Kalawe could not be contacted.

Kalawe was tasked with implementing the airline’s ninth long-term turnaround plan in 13 years to help stem the cash haemorrhage that has savaged the bottom line.

At a long-delayed annual general meeting in January, SAA admitted it had almost doubled its losses to January to R2.6-billion.

Technically insolvent SAA was able to hold the meeting only because taxpayers were forced to provide a R6.5-billion guarantee.

Bezuidenhout has been aggressively implementing an emergency 90-day action plan to try to “compress” costs and increase revenue.

Some measures have been pushed through at an unprecedented pace, likely because of the mandate given to the National Treasury to get the bankrupt state-owned enterprises back on their feet.

The flights to India and China, which accounted for R1.6-billion in losses in 2013-14, were dumped.

The Beijing route lost about R300-million a year, but was kept on because of the “dual mandate” given to parastatals to create jobs and stimulate markets for South Africa as well as generate profits.

Last month, Miyeni twice repeated the benefits of these routes, saying they had contributed directly to millions of rands worth of business for the nation.

But this week Bezuidenhout said the request to cut the unprofitable routes had been sent to the Treasury on a Friday afternoon and SAA was given the go-ahead on the Monday morning.

These flights will stop on April 1, while flights to Abu Dhabi will be introduced to take advantage of the Middle East trade.

Other cost-cutting measures have included a moratorium on hiring and the phasing in of new airline leases saving about R290-million. A new lease contract is being arranged for half the fleet.

The Free Market Foundation has, however, raised concern about what SAA stands to lose on deposits for these planes.

http://www.bdlive.co.za/businesstimes/2015/02/22/saa-may-abandon-local-flights
 
I say go for it. If it is loss making, cut it loose. But just know that other airlines will take the gap if they think they can make it work.
 
Agree, If we are going to have a flag carrying airline, the least it can do is maximise it's profit so taxpayers don't need to keep bailing it out.
 
Makes sense but how can a company with so much infrastructure and recourses not be able to compete with the smaller guys?, if its the overheads that are higher then it means they are just ineficient and need to cut costs and get rid of people that actualy have no jobs to do and need to stop wastefull expenditure.
 
I am very interested to see how they will be re-arranging their fleet. My understanding is the Boeing 737's are leased or at least some of them. Will some of the A320's go to Mango or will all of them be used on Africa flights for SAA?

That is of course if this happens, but Bezuidenhoudt seems to be on a mission. He does not just talk about a plan ..... he does it....and quickly too at that.
 
Effectively, they'll just repaint the same planes orange and call them "Mango", but at least they'll fall under the lower cost administration of Mango. Gives the lie to their official line about Mango being a completely independent carrier, though. You also have to wonder if this will really achieve anything as it has always been intimated that one of the main reasons for Mango's "efficiency" is that much of their infrastructure is piggybacked off SAA anyway.
 
This chap is bringing in some grea ideas. Hope it works out, at least he is actively trying.
 
PE to Cape town is about R3600. Break even is R1700. They make a crap load on money and the flights are full most of the time and they complain. WFT

On this, I have a round the country trip at the end of the week. What is better jnb dbn ctn jnb or jnb dbn jnb ctn jnb?

It's almost 5 hours to go from Durbs to Cape Town (Yes, there is a stop along the way)
 
I have not done so since....mmmm maybe 5 years ago? And that was the first time since I was 11 that I flew with SAA locally. All the other times I fly it has always been with one of our LCC's

That's exactly it. I'm not sure why anyone would use SAA to fly locally. Maybe business travellers are keeping them afloat. Everyone I know uses Kulula or Comair to fly locally.
 
That's exactly it. I'm not sure why anyone would use SAA to fly locally. Maybe business travellers are keeping them afloat. Everyone I know uses Kulula or Comair to fly locally.

Ja. If SAA does stop flying locally and moves all local routes over to Mango, British Airways will be all to keen to serve the business flyers I am sure.
 
I say go for it. If it is loss making, cut it loose. But just know that other airlines will take the gap if they think they can make it work.

Agreed, and we get local flight for cheaper from other airlines. If they can't compete gtfo.
 
I think they're the only local carrier that will transport weapons and ammunition. I have a flight booked in April for Huntex, so hopefully they continue for a while still or make another suitable arrangement.

From an economic perspective I understand the logic - just need many more flights from the other airlines to make up for SAA's regular flight schedule.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X