SABC board divided over blacklist report

Typical of a lot of civil servants who became to important for their own good.

Snuki Zikhalala was a common reporter at the SABC. Then Dr. Zikhalala was promoted and who is more important than a civil servant with a desk with six drawers, a carpet and a second storey office?

He made a lot of decisions which didn't please everybody. So, true to the civil service a committee to investigate this grave matter was established. Including an old boss and Gill Marcus, an advocate no less.

They made a decision and all of a sudden the sparks flew. The board could not decide whether to inform the people, whom they are supposed to serve, or to sweep it under the carpet. Tax payers pay their salary but that is beside the point. Civil servants actually knows better what will be good for the population.

The best is one of the main spanners accusing the reporter of bringing the SABC in ill repute for showing an executive out as a liar. Doesn't matter that the report showed the reporter was totally correct.

The SABC, he works in strange ways.:sick:
 
what is most interesting is that mr. mpofu keeps saying that john perlman's contradiction on air is what brought the organisation into disrepute....this is totally screwed up logic, it is infact snuki zikala that brought the organisation into disrepute by blacklisting commentators.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X