SAHRC has lost the plot....

rietrot said:
Dr. Would imply that she is educated. Just in Marxist BS.
Click to expand...
Not really. In general, depends on a Dr in what. We already saw how the education system us gamed. The something about dogs in parks rape etc ....

(I did not look to see what she is a Dr in.)
 
I wonder if any of the minority rights' groups will have anything to say about this.

I see the usual comrades are also rather silent, but then, that is to be expected. True colours and all.

So much for equality.
 
thestaggy said:
This isn't liberalism gone wild. Its black nationalism going wild. The majority are slowly making it legal to repress, target and marginalise the minority.
Click to expand...

Dr Shanelle van der Berg and co over at the SAHRC are black nationalists? Again they've just applied post modernist/intersectional ideological principles here. An ideology that is pervasive throughout the west in academia, politics, corporations, entertainment and the media. It's adherents almost all of whom identify as liberal.

Black nationalists naturally take advantage of this.
 
ToxicBunny said:
And the one with an iq low enough will think they understand but use it retardedly and just make themselves look like an idiot. #Epicness
Click to expand...
The will use it against you for a payday, sponsored by the HRC.
 
The SAHRC was interviewed on TV this morning, and the point made by the representative that there is a difference between hate speech and offensive speech, the latter is not in violation of the Constitution.
Now what someone white needs to do is have the guts to say the exact same thing as Malema, and then see how it is then evaluated.
By failing to take the matter up in a court of law has done is to prevent this matter from landing up in the Constitutional Court where the case actually belongs.
So now the answer is to make it a private case. That will take a while but it will end up in the Court and filter up to ConCourt.
 
https://www.afriforum.co.za/afriforum-oppose-hrc-ruling-malema-hate-speech/#.XJxs5EmphSg.twitter

AfriForum to oppose HRC ruling on Malema hate speech

https://www.afriforum.co.za/afrifor...accountable-court-soon/julius-malema-image-2/
AfriForum will oppose the ruling of the Human Rights Commission (HRC) – that utterances by Julius Malema, leader of the EFF, against white people does not amount to hate speech – in court. It is extremely concerning for the civil rights organisation that the HRC in essence with this ruling justifies blatant hate speech and the incitement of violence against a minority group. Further, the HRC also found today that Malema is not guilty of hate speech on various charges that were submitted against him between 2016 and 2018.
...
Click to expand...
:thumbsup:
 
Geoff.D said:
The SAHRC was interviewed on TV this morning, and the point made by the representative that there is a difference between hate speech and offensive speech, the latter is not in violation of the Constitution.
Now what someone white needs to do is have the guts to say the exact same thing as Malema, and then see how it is then evaluated.
By failing to take the matter up in a court of law has done is to prevent this matter from landing up in the Constitutional Court where the case actually belongs.
So now the answer is to make it a private case. That will take a while but it will end up in the Court and filter up to ConCourt.
Click to expand...
This will be as close to suicide as a white person will get methinks...the SAHRC made it pretty clear that numerous historical factors must be taken into account when identifying whether or not the person really means what they say. I am pretty sure the "history" of "white" people's influence in SA is quite clear, at least according to our esteemed political figures. IE: they hide behind legal rhetoric to ensure their funding remains solid whilst cleaning the posteriors of a specific crowd of political figures.
 
So basically human rights just equal human rights.

Hey you know there was this other guy that tried this. He became quite good at fine tuning this policy and implementing it on a national level :giggle:

news24dotcom.jpg
 
Well, for whatever it is worth I just reported them to themselves.

This can be found on their own website;

1553778183902.png

''It is committed to promote respect for, observance of and protection of human rights for everyone without fear or favour''

After yesterday, it is clear that it isn't for ''everyone'' and that there is clearly ''favour''. I'd even say there is fear in going after Malema as well, but I'll settle for calling them out on the other two.
 
This is the very same sahrc that ruled “kill the boer, kill the farmer” is not hate speech some years back.
https://www.politicsweb.co.za/news-and-analysis/hrc-loses-credibility-with-ruling-on-malema-statem
A few years ago, the party appealed the HRC's initial finding that the slogan “kill the boer, kill the farmer” is not hate speech. The appeal was maintained and the HRC then ruled that the slogan is indeed hate speech.

Over the years, the HRC has undermined its own credibility with its selective action and decision making with regard to hate speech.

When people like Malema or Andile Mngxitama, leader of the BLF, make unacceptable statements, the HRC will apparently only be moved to take action after being pressured by the public and a party like the FF Plus that lodges official complaints.

But in other cases, like with the primary school in Schweizer Reneke, the HRC took action almost at once and did not need any encouragement to become directly involved in the matter.
Click to expand...


https://mg.co.za/article/2011-02-23-when-it-comes-to-hate-speech-context-is-king
Another heated debate that is raging at present is the right to sing the struggle song Dubul’ iBhunu(Shoot the Boer) or chant the slogan popularised by Peter Mokaba, “Kill the boer, kill the farmer”. The issue came to the fore last year when AfriForum Youth, the youth wing of the civil rights group, AfriForum, laid a hate speech complaint against Julius Malema, the president of the ANC Youth League, at the Equality Court about his singing of Dubul’ iBhunu at his birthday party celebrations in Polokwane and at a gathering at the University of Johannesburg.

AfriForum also approached the North Gauteng High Court for an interdict. In this case Judge Eberhard Bertelsmann held that “the true yardstick of hate speech is neither the historical significance thereof nor the context in which the words are uttered, but the effect of the words, objectively considered upon those directly affected and targeted thereby”.

He added that if this yardstick was applied to the words “Dubul’ iBhunu”, the words constituted prima facie hate speech, and he interdicted Malema from singing Dubul’ iBhunu and any other songs that could “reasonably be understood or construed as being capable of instigating violence, distrust or hatred between black and white citizens in South Africa” until the first date on which the matter is heard in the Equality Court.
Click to expand...
 
ponder said:
They're probably gonna see that as racist microagression and nail your ass for it.
Click to expand...

It's getting so difficult to keep track of all the double standards in South Africa.

It's like watching a country led by people who are indecisive, confused and basically just retarded. Watching that SAHRC "woman" if you can call it that, all I could picture was this.

84287145.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X