Samsung devices do not infringe Apple design

Apple Loses Another Infringement Case Against Samsung

http://www.zeropaid.com/news/103090...il&utm_campaign=Feed:+zeropaid+(Zeropaid.com)

Dutch courts announced today that Samsung tablets do not infringe iPad’s design patents and references similar decisions in U.K. court.

For those that haven’t been following along, Apple has been taking Samsung to court over alleged design infringements for both smartphones and tablets. Starting in 2011, the two companies are now embroiled in over 50 lawsuits around the globe. Apple has had success with their lawsuits in the U.S., however they have lost hearings in South Korea, Japan, the UK and now Netherlands.
apple vs samsung

The latest Apple vs. Samsung hearing deals with the rounded corners of Samsung?s Galaxy Tab 10.1, Galaxy Tab 8.9 and Galaxy Tab 7.7 tablets, which Apple argues infringes the design of the iPad. The Hague district court judgement rejected Apple’s argument as there is no question of an infringement whilst citing similar U.K. decisions. While the most recent loss may be disheartening to Apple, Dutch courts may have fell in line with UK decisions as the lawsuit focused on design/IP patent which are subject to EU-level law. Had Apple argued from a technical patent standpoint, the decision may have been different as these are adjudicated on a country-by-country level.

In a recent statement to Reuters, Samsung said “Apple was not the first to design a tablet with a rectangular shape and rounded corners and that the origins of Apple’s registered design features can be found in numerous examples.” Samsung goes on to explain that that these excessive legal claims on such generic designs could harm innovation in the industry and limit consumer choice. While this most recent win for Samsung allows them to continue using the rounded corner design, the Dutch courts have gone back and forth between two companies for the different lawsuits. Late last year, Apple won a ban on Galaxy products running Android 2.2.1 or later that ran Samsung’s proprietary photo gallery software, due to their infringement on Apple’s “rubber-banding” software patent.

Apple has been losing all over the world. This clearly shows how stupid that US ruling really was! :D
 
No, it shows that there are different laws in different countries

Nope, just shows that the US ruling was based on a biased jury ruling.

There are good reasons why jury trials have been discontinued in many countries, including South Africa.
 
No, it shows that there are different laws in different countries

Yes, and the American laws must be really, really stupid to have allowed such a possibility.
Fortunately we now have enough other precedents in other countries to have shown us that the American jury was WAY OFF BASE.
 
Yes, and the American laws must be really, really stupid to have allowed such a possibility.
Fortunately we now have enough other precedents in other countries to have shown us that the American jury was WAY OFF BASE.

The US patent system is really weak, especially WRT patenting of prior art. At least the bounce-back and pinch-to-zoom patents have been put under scrutiny and should be invalidated.

But it is not really the US laws that are the problem, it is the patent system and biased juries.

Influential legal figures in the USA, like Judge Posner, know what is going on.
 
Nope, just shows that the US ruling was based on a biased jury ruling.

There are good reasons why jury trials have been discontinued in many countries, including South Africa.
No. Different countries, different laws and interpretation of the laws
 
Yes, and the American laws must be really, really stupid to have allowed such a possibility.
Fortunately we now have enough other precedents in other countries to have shown us that the American jury was WAY OFF BASE.

If you don't like the USA and their laws, then don't go there. Simple.
 
Don't agree, in this case the laws were not the issue.

You're choosing to believe that. Occams razor.
There is no conspiracy, people from the USA aren't stupid, or any other excuse. Their laws are just different. You might not like it, but that is not a problem
 
No. Different countries, different laws and interpretation of the laws
Yes, and their interpretation of their own laws have been shown to be out of sync with the rest of the entire world. :D
If you don't like the USA and their laws, then don't go there. Simple.
Bwahaha, what a pathetic comment, I go where ever the Hell I want. ;)
 
Compared to Apple's litigational douchery Samsung is the Mother Teresa of mobile manufacturers.

You really should read up on Samsung. Bribery of government officials, judges, knocking off Sony and other Japanese companies for over two decades, etc. The list goes on.
Like them all you want, but don't pretend they are a good guy
 
Yes, and their interpretation of their own laws have been shown to be out of sync with the rest of the entire world. :D

Bwahaha, what a pathetic comment, I go where ever the Hell I want. ;)

Laws don't need to be, and shouldn't be the same all over the world. And the USA has since it's inception been out of sync with the rest of the world. Which has worked out pretty well for them.

No you can't. You can go where people will let you go.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X