C4Cat
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2015
- Messages
- 14,305
- Reaction score
- 6,633
Well there you goDepends on their measurements.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Well there you goDepends on their measurements.
My thinking exactly. Seems like a meaningless label.Essentially, it means they like people for the same reason everyone else likes people, but they have a lekker label to slap on because labels are lit or on fleek or woke or fire or whatever the word is these days.
You're not the only one who can ninja editWell there you go
Are you romantically attracted to everyone you like?
You know what's sad is when you try flirting with somebody and you see their brain buffering in real time.You're not the only one who can ninja edit
No I'm not sexually attracted to everyone I like. But nothing puts me off faster than a moron, no matter the measurements. Unless I'm drunk or something, then maybe.
You know what's sad is when you try flirting with somebody and you see their brain buffering in real time.
Romantic attraction (as per the OP), not sexual attraction. If you're sexually attracted to intelligence in a person you would be a sapiosexual. You could be both a sapiophile and a sapiosexual of courseYou're not the only one who can ninja edit
No I'm not sexually attracted to everyone I like. But nothing puts me off faster than a moron, no matter the measurements. Unless I'm drunk or something, then maybe.
Of course yes, both are possible. And I believe everyone fits in to that category to a degree. It's really a relative term. You might find a sapiophilic attraction to a certain person who I might find to be a dullard and set my sights higher. It's all relative.Romantic attraction (as per the OP), not sexual attraction. If you're sexually attracted to intelligence in a person you would be a sapiosexual. You could be both a sapiophile and a sapiosexual of course
You used essentially to follow another paragraph where you were essential to begin with and concluded in what essentially is the street version of your initial essential postIt essentially boils down to the person being attracted to intellectual conversation, knowledge on various issues and the ability to hold a conversation. Often contributed to by knowledge and interest in common issues which builds understanding and agreement.
Essentially, it means they like people for the same reason everyone else likes people, but they have a lekker label to slap on because labels are lit or on fleek or woke or fire or whatever the word is these days.
It also often means, "I like you for your mind but we're not pomping because my body is a temple" or similar.
In essence, yes.You used essentially to follow another paragraph where you were essential to begin with and concluded in what essentially is the street version of your initial essential post
Romantic and sexual attraction go hand in hand IMORomantic attraction (as per the OP), not sexual attraction. If you're sexually attracted to intelligence in a person you would be a sapiosexual. You could be both a sapiophile and a sapiosexual of course
I'd say they'd want opposite to happen.I see it all the time on dating profiles. As best I can gather, it means something like:
"I'm of average intelligence and deeply insecure about it. I like hanging out with someone who makes me feel smart and am easily impressed by someone with a broad general knowledge. Don't you dare disagree with me on any of my half-baked ideas or poorly reasoned opinions"
YMMV
Basically you got to the bottom of itIn essence, yes.
Was just trying to get to the root of the issue.Basically you got to the bottom of it