erm... sure, lets go with thatAnd you're in favour of this?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
erm... sure, lets go with thatAnd you're in favour of this?
How are things there in the office? Do you miss Zuma?erm... sure, lets go with that![]()
With Zuma gone, I'm the boss, I get the swi... I mean, fire poolsHow are things there in the office? Do you miss Zuma?
Please quote on 4 x P4 3.0Ghz, 512MB RAM and flatscreen delivered to SARS HQ.Any tech specs so we can work out actual cost?
Please quote on 4 x P4 3.0Ghz, 512MB RAM and flatscreen delivered to SARS HQ.
(Every BBEBEBEEE company tendering).
I've never understood how these government IT projects snowball into such monumental amounts. Like how a city website can balloon into a R100m expense, or the new eNatis database cost R600m. Sure, I understand they' re doing things at scale with all the complexity and inertia around government systems, but still, you could literally hire a team comprising many hundreds of top analysts and devs to work around the clock for a few years at that expense. And if, for all that, all Gartner did was provide flawed advice, it is absolutely jaw droppingly inefficient compared to the kind of systems some private sector companies have developed for their internal systems at a tenth of the cost.
Still my language of choice.... (showing my age hereI have heard (from a consultant that did some work there), that the systems are in an absolute mess, with a lot of old legacy stuff.
How is your Adabas/Natural and Cobol ?
“Effectively because of the fact that our support functions are not helping the digital environment, infrastructure updates are far behind and its pointing towards the imminent collapse of digital infrastructure within Sars.
What's a billion... our esteemed CANCER government thinks its chump changeAnother day. Another billion to be flushed down the great white porcelain express.
How on earth does it cost R1 Billion to "fix problems" in a system like that? Or is it more a case of like 10 years of technical debt catching up to them.
Surely it would be cheaper to re-write it from scratch?
Any tech specs so we can work out actual cost?
I've never understood how these government IT projects snowball into such monumental amounts. Like how a city website can balloon into a R100m expense, or the new eNatis database cost R600m. Sure, I understand they' re doing things at scale with all the complexity and inertia around government systems,
That is because the private sector is dealing with money that is not obtained by the barrel of a gun. Government officials have precisely zero incentive to contain their costs.[/QUOTE]And if, for all that, all Gartner did was provide flawed advice, it is absolutely jaw droppingly inefficient compared to the kind of systems some private sector companies have developed for their internal systems at a tenth of the cost.
Why assume it was Gartner's fault that they have nothing to show for it?
The report added that R200 million previously paid to Gartner to overhaul Sars’ IT systems was “not worth” the money spent.