Sharks Supporters Thread

It's called backup ..... how many times in the past have we lost a flyhalf and been totally fscked by the event? Plenty times. Now we'll have ample backup for our backline as well as our forwards, so no matter injuries (hopefully not), we can carry on.
 
Now imagine Mvovo on the wing today instead of the useless Habana ..... man, it would have been awesome.
 
we chucked it away but props to the Bulls, they had more eagerness in the end ..... we're still in a comfy spot :)
 
Us (Sharks) have allot of work ahead of us before the semis. We can not afford so many handling errors..
Besides that we have a strong and exciting side
 
What do all you Guys say we Need to Keep John Smit at the Sharks for a future Role.Has this been discussed before?
 
What do all you Guys say we Need to Keep John Smit at the Sharks for a future Role.Has this been discussed before?

I won't mind if we keep or lose John Smit. He had a brilliant career, but Bismarck is the better option.
 
I won't mind if we keep or lose John Smit. He had a brilliant career, but Bismarck is the better option.

I am going with Bismarck as my preference to Hooker. Smit has been a superb servant to the game in general and I wouldn't mind heading off to Europe to earn his retirement.

Apart from Bismarck there is still Craig Burden, a solid and versatile player.
 
I'd like to see him for one or two more games at Loosehead, where he gave a good go during the S14. When him and Bissy and Jannie were packing down together, it was an awesome front row and the one we have now, is not quite there as a unit.
 
Away game at 19h00 tonight... watch out Pumas, Sharks are on the rebound!!!
 
I'd still like to know how they landed up being called "The Pumas?"

I'm yet to see a single puma in SA...:confused:

Although i suppose you don't have to be a brain surgeon to be in rugby management. Just look at Louis Luyt...
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X