Should Multichoice be forced to carry channels?

Should Multichoice be forced to carry channels?

  • Yes

    Votes: 54 23.4%
  • No

    Votes: 153 66.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 24 10.4%

  • Total voters
    231
If Multichoice sets up a 2 year contract, which you cannot default on, then they should carry at least an equivalent of what you signed up for.

I am seriously considering cancelling my subscription because there so so little suitable material to watch for the premium price I pay every month.
 
Yes, they are a Monopoly... they must be regulated...
This gov. is capable of regulating?
But don't worry, MC are really doing themselves in now with their overpowering local-is-lekker policy.
 
Only ever watch golf and tennis channels. Nothing else, and also on someone else's account. I would not even pay for that. So, I do not mis any cancelled channels.
So you actually are a parasite, and not a subscriber..........
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pax
I do not care really, but are one of the ones in the minority that voted yes. They make enough money and are running a monopoly.
There is an open marketplace - if you want to broadcast it, you must outbid the competition. DSTV are NOT a monopoly, and are just a business with shareholders - all of whom expect a return on their investment just like everyone else. E tv just want to ride on DSTV coattails for free. Just because you think a DSTV subscription is a rip off does not make it so. If e tv had their own broadcast mechanism would you pay ANYTHING for it?? Personally I would like to select the DSTV channel package that I DO watch, and not cross subsidise the losers like e tv, russia tv, ethnic tv, music channels and local content programs.
 
DSTV are NOT a monopoly
Sport manipulation, American studios' rights manipulation? They are definitely a monopoly.

Just because you think a DSTV subscription is a rip off does not make it so.
True. Nor is your belief that they're not a monopoly make that so.

BUT.... our grabbamint thinks they can do what they want and are terribly shortsighted, so... no real solution currently, just like many other issues in this lost-the-plot nation.
 
I don't care, DSTV is just a lot of bull. Not interested in DSTV, I subscribe to oversea's channels, not a repeat of everything like DSTV and then you must pay a lot of money for it.
 
There is an open marketplace - if you want to broadcast it, you must outbid the competition. DSTV are NOT a monopoly, and are just a business with shareholders - all of whom expect a return on their investment just like everyone else. E tv just want to ride on DSTV coattails for free. Just because you think a DSTV subscription is a rip off does not make it so. If e tv had their own broadcast mechanism would you pay ANYTHING for it?? Personally I would like to select the DSTV channel package that I DO watch, and not cross subsidise the losers like e tv, russia tv, ethnic tv, music channels and local content programs.
Still say they are a monopoly. The only broadcasting that I can subscribe to if I want to. I can't get any sport or decent movies on any other broadcasting medium except for streaming which I can't do or do for everything.
 
If Multichoice has a monopoly over the market then it makes sense for them to be force ‍♂️
 
There is an open marketplace - if you want to broadcast it, you must outbid the competition. DSTV are NOT a monopoly, and are just a business with shareholders - all of whom expect a return on their investment just like everyone else. E tv just want to ride on DSTV coattails for free. Just because you think a DSTV subscription is a rip off does not make it so. If e tv had their own broadcast mechanism would you pay ANYTHING for it?? Personally I would like to select the DSTV channel package that I DO watch, and not cross subsidise the losers like e tv, russia tv, ethnic tv, music channels and local content programs.
Multichoice are clearly a monopoly, the literal textbook definition. Survey any sample of the South Africa population and they won't be able to name a Multichoice competitor with as wide a reach as they have.
 
Most of the etv channels are available free-to-air. Just install an aerial and plug it in to your digital receiver (either built into most of the better current TVs, or get a cheap (free if you are an indigent) set-top box. Problem solved.

After doing that, can that DStv subscription
 
Most of the etv channels are available free-to-air. Just install an aerial and plug it in to your digital receiver (either built into most of the better current TVs, or get a cheap (free if you are an indigent) set-top box. Problem solved.

After doing that, can that DStv subscription
Problem for many is recording the eTV movie chs., which DStv makes it easier to do (at a price unfortunately). Even on satellite OpenViewHD the few built-in recording options are clumsy at best.
 
Yes and now if we can force them to show new programming & stop running channels with 98% repeats that would be great also.
 
Might be something in the "shortage of channels" story after all; one of their latest extras, for Namibia, has now been suspended and another expected, for Zambia, hasn't arrived..
 
Problem for many is recording the eTV movie chs., which DStv makes it easier to do (at a price unfortunately). Even on satellite OpenViewHD the few built-in recording options are clumsy at best.
The free-to-air TV's and set-top boxes record straight to an external hard disk. You can even set up schedules. Not clunky at all. No need for a satellite decoder...
 
The free-to-air TV's and set-top boxes record straight to an external hard disk. You can even set up schedules. Not clunky at all. No need for a satellite decoder...
I've worked with this.
Quality DVB-T2 STBs possibly, but these eMovie fans usually couldn't afford anything fancy and don't want to drop their smaller DStv package.
 
This is a South African issue we are talking about where everybody gets forced to do things according to the African National Congress's rules and regulations (Socialism), correct?

Things like the more affluent needing to pay all sorts of taxes while certain other individuals work strictly cash based and hide it under their mattresses to evade tax and get away with it due to a total lack of "policing" on them.

"Socialism, on the other hand, is popular among the masses that for some reason have not had the financial success that others have gained through their labor, like in the capitalist system. The predominant socialist-oriented countries of Europe and Africa, and Cuba and Venezuela in the Latin countries, with the “poster” country of disaster, Greece, are all close to or on the verge of bankruptcy. It seems that countries that espouse a plethora of government entitlement programs (giveaways and handouts) are the ones in dire financial straits. You could say that the old expression “There’s no such thing as a free lunch” applies to these countries, except for the government elites who become the wealthy class while the masses wallow in poverty." - Chuck Lehmann

An interesting definition, exactly where SA is heading, and at a snowball effect. The bigger it get, the faster it travels until its final destruction if and when it should collide into something much bigger than it. :-|
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X