If smoking does impact intelligence or affect IQ, people can make a more informed decision. It will also determine in those places where it's legal - at what age it should be legal. People can't just draft laws without sufficient information to support those laws, and something like the ages during which a person is most susceptible to being impaired by weed is a useful metric. If indeed any such impairment occurs.Who cares, if people want to smoke the stuff let them smoke it, let it be their free choice.
I would much prefer to have a stoner as a friend than a drunk who kills people on the road and gets aggressive with their families while hardly being able to stand and puking everywhere, been there seen that with friends, disgusting.
And even for adults it's important to know the risks. It's like having a lackadaisical attitude toward cigarettes in the 70's: "Ah man it's all good enjoy!" But we don't think that way anymore because we have sufficient information about cigarettes to make a conscious decision to smoke less / not at all. And I don't think weed should be exempt from that attitude.
Last edited: