South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
You can't generate power which isn't consumed. We'll I guess you can if you load up and ship out charged batteries, but who does that?
Feedback into the grid would make the calculations harder.
What I am getting at is that if you include "wasted" generation which is never consumed (due to over-spec or whatever) into the calculation that could skew the data away from a like-for-like comparison against a grid-consuming customer. If you do include wasted generation your "price per watt" will be artificially lower. Whereas the actual consumed price per watt will be much higher.
This is what a full pv day looks like. Batteries are fully charged by 12pm but they are used up by 1am the following morning.I'm a bit confused. If consumption exceeds production, then shouldn't there be nothing available to feed the grid?

I presume your meter does not run backwards when you're feeding back as some have mentioned on the forum?This is what a full pv day looks like. Batteries are fully charged by 12pm but they are used up by 1am the following morning.
This is in summer but autumn and winter my batteries are only fully charged by 3pm so the US very little that is feeding back into the grid.
You also have to minus the opportunity cost if looking at it from a purely financial perspective. Let's say you spent 100k on your system, putting that into a goalsave instead would net you ~8k in the first year as an example.Basically the cost to install and all equipment plus any maintenance and upgrade costs divided by the total kWh generated.
You're going to have to explain how you got to that calc. Why 6*365*5?Rough calc for me -
130,000k cost
5*365*20 = 36,500, 6*365*5 = 10950 (11 years / 365 days a year) = 47450
R2.73 including storage (10kWhr)
----
Also have a newer system that was about 90k (8kw/9.4kw panels). Need to add storage to that at some point.
Not really in use yet.
I moved.You're going to have to explain how you got to that calc. Why 6*365*5?
Great idea just not sure how long those batteries would be charging before they find new owners hahaha.Now you've given me an idea.
I think I need a little charging station outside my gate that my neighbours can wheel their batteries over to and pay with snapscan.
Yep of course being maintenance or repairs free for as long as possible would be ideal and would also bring the R/kWh down. However, I just make these calcs for the sake of interest and I like playing with data.Im at R71 for this calc - clearly need another couple years of maintenance free production. Which i guess is what we're all aiming for
Agreed but this is not just about ROI.
Having real world data is useful. At my current trajectory I think my cost per kWh will be less than what it would cost to buy from CoCT by the end of 2023.
My wife works permanently from home so trying to factor that benefit into any ROI calculation is not possible.
Yeah, by calcs I should be hitting break-even in under 5 years.Reaching a break-even unit cost within 5 years (if I understand the time periods) is fantastic. For some reason I always thought it takes closer to 10 years ignoring the value of the luxury of not having hours without power.
| Installation Date | 24 November 2021 | |
| Total Solar Cost | R 220 000.00 | |
| Effeciency | 74% | |
| Current Saving | R 17 724.57 | |
| Payback Yrs | 7.24 | |
| Date | 17 February 2029 | |
| Average cost per KW- Solar | R 35.70 |
Have you done a post/thread about feeding back into the grid and how it all works? Have I not nagged you about one before?Average cost per kWh after June 2022 is R8.54/KWh.
