True, but there are many reasons for trustees to increase numbers from other sources. Sometimes tenants have special skills that they need, many times owners are absent / don't care / don't attend meetings / don't do the job of being a trustee / zero output / don't have time. And many owner trustees are in it for their own selfish reasons, cannot spell the phrase "fiduciary duty". Ideally one would want the majority of trustees to be resident owners, in many schemes this is simply not the case. In these schemes, sometimes where over 90% of residents are tenants, there are benefits to having resident trustees.
I would say that there needs to be a balance, or perhaps make an "honorary trustee" role that does not have a voting right for financial matters.
