'Squatter camp' slams ANC plan

edc

Banned
Joined
Nov 15, 2006
Messages
987
Reaction score
0
http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/News/0,,2-7-1442_2112762,00.html
Pretoria - An informal settlement, a burning tyre and chickens outside a Pretoria high-income residential area would perhaps show the government that low-income housing built in high-income residential areas would not work, said Solidarity Youth on Sunday.

Solidarity Youth Pretoria spokesman Francois Coetzee said that although Solidarity was not against the building of low-cost housing, it was against the building of low-cost housing in high-income residential areas.

"The government wants to force social and economic development. We are against the enforcement of spatial and economic development.

"We would rather like to see development in underdeveloped residential areas," he said.

Coetzee was speaking after a Solidarity Youth protest on Saturday in which a mock informal settlement camp was set up outside a residential area in Silver Lakes, east of Pretoria.

Animals in enclosure

The "settlement", built of corrugated iron, together with an old maroon couch, was what the 15 protesters used for shelter and comfort.

Four chickens and a two goats in an enclosure also featured in the protest that included a burning tyre.

"We received complaints from people living behind the 'informal settlement', but other than that we did not get into trouble," said Coetzee.

"The reason we did this was because of the Tshwane municipality's plans to erect low-cost housing within existing residential areas in Pretoria," he said.

Coetzee said that if this was to take place it would have a negative impact on the prices of existing houses.

The Gauteng housing department could not be reached for comment.
Who could have foreseen that their idea coukd not work? Only the critics with their mystic glass balls did when it was proposed, oh and they were correct. :)
 
The Gauteng housing department could not be reached for comment.

Wow! Really? What a surprise.

We should just abbreviate that - save space. "The Gauteng housing department CNBRFC" - neater? huh?
 
Wow! Really? What a surprise.

We should just abbreviate that - save space. "The Gauteng housing department CNBRFC" - neater? huh?

or, perhaps,
- the Gauteng HD HFTS (had ........ to say)
- the Gauteng HD were CAU (clueless as usual)
 
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=nw20070514080920487C190011

Mixed settlements seem to be working just fine at this place. And no mention of house prices going down.

It looks like a very new development, and will only be finished by the end of the year. I think give it another year or two, and then it will make more sense to see what the status are.

Do the former informal settlement people expect to be employed by the "richer" people, or how do they expect this to help them?
 
http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=13&art_id=nw20070514080920487C190011

Mixed settlements seem to be working just fine at this place. And no mention of house prices going down.

Way too early to tell - how many of those houses have been resold?

I expect an averaging - the cheaper houses will go up (close to work ie. as a domestic), and the wealthier houses will go down in value (too close to the shabby informal areas).

Only time will tell who is right.
 
Way too early to tell - how many of those houses have been resold?

I expect an averaging - the cheaper houses will go up (close to work ie. as a domestic), and the wealthier houses will go down in value (too close to the shabby informal areas).

Only time will tell who is right.

To a certain extent this hold for conventional areas as well.

An experienced property guy advised me years ago to never buy a property as more than 50% of the going price in an area. As years go by, the higher priced units in a suburb "shed" some of their value to the lower priced units.

My first property I did not heed to the advice, and paid the price.

My second property, I did not make the same error....I managed to buy the smallest place in a posh area :D

The problem with these mixed wealth areas are that the super units are going to shed too much value to the econo units.
 
I think it will work just fine.

Move them in and i'll come buy the land once they're settled, demolish the settlement, and build high-cost houses.

:rolleyes:

I'm curioust to see how much this "low-income" land is going to cost and how on earth they think they're gonna stop developers from buying it.

It's like selling 5 ferrari's, 3 at 1/4 price but painted yellow, the other 2 at full price and proper. I'll buy the 3 at 1/4 price and have them painted ferrari red and sell them at 3/4 price.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X